Table 6 Partial equilibrium analysis scenarios 1 through 6
1 - Back to Uruguay |
2 - Back to Tokyo |
3 - 1980 Transportation costs | ||||
A reversion from current |
A reversion from current |
A reversion to 1980 | ||||
Impact on US exports |
Impact on US imports |
Impact on US exports |
Impact on US imports |
Impact on US exports |
Impact on US imports | |
Initial/present tariff/AVE (percent) |
3.9 |
2.5 |
3.9 |
2.5 |
3.2 |
3.2 |
Final/past tariff/AVE (percent) |
13.5 |
4.1 |
17.9 |
6.0 |
4.3 |
4.3 |
Tariff percentage point change |
-9.5 |
-1.5 |
-14.0 |
-3.5 |
-1.1 |
-1.1 |
2004 US exports to partners (billions of dollars) |
707 |
707 |
707 |
707 |
707 |
707 |
2004 US imports from partners (billions of dollars) |
1,294 |
1,294 |
1,294 |
1,294 |
1,294 |
1,294 |
Export price elasticity |
-1.17 |
-1.17 |
-1.17 |
-1.17 |
-1.17 |
-1.17 |
Import price elasticity |
-1.30 |
-1.30 |
-1.30 |
-1.30 |
-1.30 |
-1.30 |
Applicable elasticity |
Export |
Import |
Export |
Import |
Export |
Import |
Applicable trade flow |
Export |
Import |
Export |
Import |
Export |
Import |
Impact on trade (tariff/AVE change*elasticity) |
11.12 |
2.00 |
16.29 |
4.54 |
1.28 |
1.43 |
Hypothetical trade after tariff/AVE change (billions of dollars) |
629 |
1,268 |
592 |
1,235 |
698 |
1,276 |
Impact of tariff/AVE change (billions of dollars) |
79 |
26 |
115 |
59 |
9 |
19 |
4 - No preferential |
5 - NTB reversion |
6 - Back to 1990 MFN | ||||
A reversion from current |
A reversion from Kee, |
A reversion from current | ||||
Impact on US exports |
Impact on US imports |
Impact on US exports |
Impact on US imports |
Impact on US exports |
Impact on US imports | |
Initial/present tariff/AVE (percent) |
3.9 |
2.5 |
10.3 |
7.5 |
3.9 |
2.5 |
Final/past tariff/AVE (percent) |
7.4 |
3.8 |
20.5 |
15.4 |
10.3 |
5.7 |
Tariff percentage point change |
-3.5 |
-1.2 |
-10.2 |
-7.9 |
-6.4 |
-3.2 |
2004 US exports to partners (billions of dollars) |
707 |
707 |
707 |
707 |
707 |
707 |
2004 US imports from partners (billions of dollars) |
1,294 |
1,294 |
1,294 |
1,294 |
1,294 |
1,294 |
Export price elasticity |
-1.17 |
-1.17 |
-1.17 |
-1.17 |
-1.17 |
-1.17 |
Import price elasticity |
-1.30 |
-1.30 |
-1.30 |
-1.30 |
-1.30 |
-1.30 |
Applicable elasticity |
Export |
Import |
Export |
Import |
Export |
Import |
Applicable trade flow |
Export |
Import |
Export |
Import |
Export |
Import |
Impact on trade (tariff/AVE change*elasticity) |
4.08 |
1.59 |
11.91 |
10.22 |
7.45 |
4.14 |
Hypothetical trade after tariff/AVE change (billions of dollars) |
678 |
1,273 |
623 |
1,162 |
655 |
1,240 |
Impact of tariff/AVE change (billions of dollars) |
29 |
21 |
84 |
132 |
53 |
54 |
AVE = ad valorem equivalent, NTB = nontariff barrie r, MFN = most favored nation
Sources: UN Comtrade Database via WITS (2008); TRAINS Database via WITS (2008); Kee, Nicita, and Olarreaga (2004, 2005); Hummels (2007); authors' calculations.
24
More intriguing information
1. CGE modelling of the resources boom in Indonesia and Australia using TERM2. The name is absent
3. THE AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS LABORATORY
4. Problems of operationalizing the concept of a cost-of-living index
5. Improving Business Cycle Forecasts’ Accuracy - What Can We Learn from Past Errors?
6. The name is absent
7. Estimating the Economic Value of Specific Characteristics Associated with Angus Bulls Sold at Auction
8. ISSUES AND PROBLEMS OF IMMEDIATE CONCERN
9. CAPACITAÇÃO GERENCIAL DE AGRICULTORES FAMILIARES: UMA PROPOSTA METODOLÓGICA DE EXTENSÃO RURAL
10. Technological progress, organizational change and the size of the Human Resources Department