Table 6 Partial equilibrium analysis scenarios 1 through 6
1 - Back to Uruguay |
2 - Back to Tokyo |
3 - 1980 Transportation costs | ||||
A reversion from current |
A reversion from current |
A reversion to 1980 | ||||
Impact on US exports |
Impact on US imports |
Impact on US exports |
Impact on US imports |
Impact on US exports |
Impact on US imports | |
Initial/present tariff/AVE (percent) |
3.9 |
2.5 |
3.9 |
2.5 |
3.2 |
3.2 |
Final/past tariff/AVE (percent) |
13.5 |
4.1 |
17.9 |
6.0 |
4.3 |
4.3 |
Tariff percentage point change |
-9.5 |
-1.5 |
-14.0 |
-3.5 |
-1.1 |
-1.1 |
2004 US exports to partners (billions of dollars) |
707 |
707 |
707 |
707 |
707 |
707 |
2004 US imports from partners (billions of dollars) |
1,294 |
1,294 |
1,294 |
1,294 |
1,294 |
1,294 |
Export price elasticity |
-1.17 |
-1.17 |
-1.17 |
-1.17 |
-1.17 |
-1.17 |
Import price elasticity |
-1.30 |
-1.30 |
-1.30 |
-1.30 |
-1.30 |
-1.30 |
Applicable elasticity |
Export |
Import |
Export |
Import |
Export |
Import |
Applicable trade flow |
Export |
Import |
Export |
Import |
Export |
Import |
Impact on trade (tariff/AVE change*elasticity) |
11.12 |
2.00 |
16.29 |
4.54 |
1.28 |
1.43 |
Hypothetical trade after tariff/AVE change (billions of dollars) |
629 |
1,268 |
592 |
1,235 |
698 |
1,276 |
Impact of tariff/AVE change (billions of dollars) |
79 |
26 |
115 |
59 |
9 |
19 |
4 - No preferential |
5 - NTB reversion |
6 - Back to 1990 MFN | ||||
A reversion from current |
A reversion from Kee, |
A reversion from current | ||||
Impact on US exports |
Impact on US imports |
Impact on US exports |
Impact on US imports |
Impact on US exports |
Impact on US imports | |
Initial/present tariff/AVE (percent) |
3.9 |
2.5 |
10.3 |
7.5 |
3.9 |
2.5 |
Final/past tariff/AVE (percent) |
7.4 |
3.8 |
20.5 |
15.4 |
10.3 |
5.7 |
Tariff percentage point change |
-3.5 |
-1.2 |
-10.2 |
-7.9 |
-6.4 |
-3.2 |
2004 US exports to partners (billions of dollars) |
707 |
707 |
707 |
707 |
707 |
707 |
2004 US imports from partners (billions of dollars) |
1,294 |
1,294 |
1,294 |
1,294 |
1,294 |
1,294 |
Export price elasticity |
-1.17 |
-1.17 |
-1.17 |
-1.17 |
-1.17 |
-1.17 |
Import price elasticity |
-1.30 |
-1.30 |
-1.30 |
-1.30 |
-1.30 |
-1.30 |
Applicable elasticity |
Export |
Import |
Export |
Import |
Export |
Import |
Applicable trade flow |
Export |
Import |
Export |
Import |
Export |
Import |
Impact on trade (tariff/AVE change*elasticity) |
4.08 |
1.59 |
11.91 |
10.22 |
7.45 |
4.14 |
Hypothetical trade after tariff/AVE change (billions of dollars) |
678 |
1,273 |
623 |
1,162 |
655 |
1,240 |
Impact of tariff/AVE change (billions of dollars) |
29 |
21 |
84 |
132 |
53 |
54 |
AVE = ad valorem equivalent, NTB = nontariff barrie r, MFN = most favored nation
Sources: UN Comtrade Database via WITS (2008); TRAINS Database via WITS (2008); Kee, Nicita, and Olarreaga (2004, 2005); Hummels (2007); authors' calculations.
24
More intriguing information
1. Ahorro y crecimiento: alguna evidencia para la economía argentina, 1970-20042. Non Linear Contracting and Endogenous Buyer Power between Manufacturers and Retailers: Empirical Evidence on Food Retailing in France
3. The Mathematical Components of Engineering
4. Dynamic Explanations of Industry Structure and Performance
5. Correlates of Alcoholic Blackout Experience
6. AN ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF COTTON AND PEANUT RESEARCH IN SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
7. On Dictatorship, Economic Development and Stability
8. The name is absent
9. Does Presenting Patients’ BMI Increase Documentation of Obesity?
10. Structure and objectives of Austria's foreign direct investment in the four adjacent Central and Eastern European countries Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovenia and Slovakia