Table 7 Increase in US trade due to policy liberalization, declining transportation costs, and GDP
growth, 1980 to 2005 (billions of US dollars)
Partner/world estimates |
Exports |
Imports |
Total trade |
Trade with 17 partner estimates | |||
Observed US merchandise trade in 1980 with 17 partners |
166 |
173 |
338 |
Observed US merchandise trade in 2004 with 17 partners |
707 |
1294 |
2001 |
Observed increase in trade from 1980 to 2004 in merchandise trade |
542 |
1121 |
1663 |
Trade growth explained by GDP growth and income elasticities of trade |
413 |
970 |
1384 |
Trade growth explained by appreciation of US dollar and price elasticities of trade |
-53 |
77 |
24 |
Trade growth not explained by GDP growth or exchange rate change |
181 |
74 |
255 |
Trade growth explained by traditional trade policy liberalization (i.e., tariffs) (Scenario 2) |
115 |
59 |
174 |
Trade growth explained by lower transport costs (Scenario 3) |
9 |
19 |
28 |
Trade growth explained by nontariff barrier cuts (Scenario 5) |
84 |
132 |
216 |
Trade with world estimates (extrapolated from above) | |||
Observed US merchandise trade in 1980 with 17 partners |
221 |
253 |
474 |
Observed US merchandise trade in 2004 with 17 partners |
818 |
1525 |
2343 |
Observed increase in trade from 1980 to 2004 in merchandise trade |
597 |
1272 |
1869 |
Trade growth explained by GDP growth and income elasticities of trade |
447 |
1152 |
1599 |
Trade growth explained by appreciation of US dollar and price elasticities of trade |
-64 |
88 |
24 |
Trade growth not explained by GDP growth or exchange rate change |
215 |
32 |
246 |
Trade growth explained by traditional trade policy liberalization (i.e., tariffs) (Scenario 2) |
135 |
69 |
204 |
Trade growth explained by lower transport costs (Scenario 3) |
11 |
22 |
33 |
Trade growth explained by nontariff barrier cuts (Scenario 5) |
99 |
155 |
253 |
Memorandum (GDP growth rate, 1980 to 2004): |
Growth (percent) | ||
Weighted average (by 1990 GDP) of 18 country GDP growth |
312 | ||
World GDP growth |
253 | ||
Memorandum (income and price elasticities): |
Export |
Import | |
Price elasticities (Kee, Nicita, and Olarreaga 2004) |
-1.17 |
-1.30 | |
Income elasticities (Hooper, Johnson, and Marquez 2000) |
0.80 |
1.80 | |
Memorandum (exchange rate change): |
Change in index value | ||
Real equilibrium exchange rate change, 1980-2004 |
10.88 |
Notes: Exchange rate effect is calculated by: [10.88∕86.88]*[relevant price elasticity]*[relevant one-way US 1992 trade]—{times -1 for imports}
Sources: Hummels (2007); TRAINS Database via WITS (2008); UN Comtrade Database via WITS (2008); WTO (2008); Kee, Nicita, and Olarreaga (2004);
Hooper, Johnson, and Marquez (2000); IMF International Financial Statistics, November 2008; IMF World Economic Outlook, October 2008; authors'
calculations.
25
More intriguing information
1. Parallel and overlapping Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Hepatitis B and C virus Infections among pregnant women in the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Response speeds of direct and securitized real estate to shocks in the fundamentals
5. The name is absent
6. ARE VOLATILITY EXPECTATIONS CHARACTERIZED BY REGIME SHIFTS? EVIDENCE FROM IMPLIED VOLATILITY INDICES
7. Experimental Evidence of Risk Aversion in Consumer Markets: The Case of Beef Tenderness
8. INTERACTION EFFECTS OF PROMOTION, RESEARCH, AND PRICE SUPPORT PROGRAMS FOR U.S. COTTON
9. ASSESSMENT OF MARKET RISK IN HOG PRODUCTION USING VALUE-AT-RISK AND EXTREME VALUE THEORY
10. LOCAL CONTROL AND IMPROVEMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICE