The name is absent

0
О
(Φ(w_s(t))e).(v_s(t) + v_s) - Φ(w_s(t))E_i

О
О
(Φ(w_s)e).v_s(i) - Φ(w_s)E_i
ɪ [BI_ω(i)

2πα∆rr I_s(t)

w_s(t) = (^a(^vs(*) + ^vs) - ^w_s(t)).∕B(v_s(t) +v_s),

where v_s ∈ R^λ'^s, v_w ∈ R-^7v,", and w_w ∈ R^λ,,""ⁱ_i and where Q ∈ lR^7vR^m+i)×⁷M^m+i)

active input matrix, c = ₂/?_а(кж)² ’ ^an^ ^where e^_w ∈ R^'R^m+¹) ⅛ the coordinate
vector corresponding to N_w. The definitions of the ionic term Φ and the strong
gating variables w_s follow as in §3, just adjusted to the proper number of strong
compartments.

Notice that the nonlinear term Φ has been split into two parts, one at which
to evaluate the ionic currents at the absolute strong voltage and one at the resting
strong voltage. This is because the state variables are with respect to rest, but Φ takes
absolute voltage values, implying that the ionic term is not computed with respect
to rest, unlike the other quantities in the system. This nonlinear ionic contribution

<<   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   >>

More intriguing information