An Efficient Circulant MIMO Equalizer for CDMA Downlink: Algorithm and VLSI Architecture



EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing

Figure 4: The merged 2 × 2 inverse and multiplication.


Figure 5: The data path of the partitioned 4 × 4 matrix inverse for each subcarrier.


It can be shown that the subblocks are given by the following
equations from the matrix inverse lemma [
22]:

C22(i) = [B22(i) ^ B21(i)B11(i) 1B12(i)]   ,

C12(i) = -B11(i)-1B12(i)C22(i),

C21(i) = -C22(i)B21(i)B11(i)-1,

C11(i) = B11(i)-1 - C12(i)B21(i)B11(i)-1.

(21)


Without looking into the data dependency, a straightfor-
ward computation will have 8 complex matrix multiplica-
tions, 2 complex matrix inverses, and 2 complex matrix sub-
tractions, all of the size (2
× 2). By examining the data de-
pendency, we will find some duplicate operations in the data
path. For a general case before considering the Hermitian
structure of the
F[i] matrix, a sequential computation has the
data-dependency path given by
Figure 5. The raw complex-
ity is given by 6 matrix mult, 2 inverses, and 2 substractions.
From the data path flow, the critical path can be identified.

Now we utilize the Hermitian feature of the F matrix
to derive more parallel computing architecture. Because the
inverse of a Hermitian matrix is Hermitian, that is,
F-1 =
[F-1]H, it can be shown that

B-11(i) = [B-1(i)]H = C11(i) = [C11(i)]H,
B12(i) = [B21(i)]H = C12(i) = [C21(i)]H,     (22)

B22(i) = [B22(i)]H = C22(i) = [C22(i)]H.

This leads to the data path by removing the duplicate compu-
tation blocks that has the Hermitian relationship. However,
this straightforward treatment still does not lead to the most
e
fficient computing architecture. The data path is still con-
structed with a very long dependency path. To fully extract
the commonality and regulate the design blocks in VLSI, we
define the following special operators on the (2
× 2) matrices
for the di
fferent complex operations. These special operators
are mapped to VLSI processing units to deal with the special
Hermitian matrix.

Definition 1 (pseudo-power). pPow(a, b) = %(a) ■ %(b) +
3 ( a) ■ 3 ( b) is defined as the pseudo-power function of two
complex numbers and
%(a, b) = %(a) ■ %( b) - 3 ( a) ■ 3 ( b)
is defined as the real part ofa complex multiplication.

Definition 2 (complex-hermitian-mult). For a general (2 ×2)
matrix
A and a Hermitian (2 × 2) matrix B = BH, we define
the operator CHM (
Complex-Hermitian-mult) as

M(A, B) = AB = (a11 a 12Wb11 b21 ʌ .     (23)

a21 a22    b21 b22

Note that all the numbers are complex except {b11, b22} R.

Definition 3 (Hermitian inverse). For a (2 × 2) Hermitian
matrix
B = BH, the Hermitian inverse (HInv) operator is



More intriguing information

1. Revisiting The Bell Curve Debate Regarding the Effects of Cognitive Ability on Wages
2. On the Existence of the Moments of the Asymptotic Trace Statistic
3. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in patients with ICDs and Pacemakers
4. Citizenship
5. The Impact of Financial Openness on Economic Integration: Evidence from the Europe and the Cis
6. Valuing Farm Financial Information
7. On the Integration of Digital Technologies into Mathematics Classrooms
8. The name is absent
9. Literary criticism as such can perhaps be called the art of rereading.
10. The Shepherd Sinfonia
11. The name is absent
12. Fiscal Insurance and Debt Management in OECD Economies
13. The name is absent
14. The Dynamic Cost of the Draft
15. SAEA EDITOR'S REPORT, FEBRUARY 1988
16. Structure and objectives of Austria's foreign direct investment in the four adjacent Central and Eastern European countries Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovenia and Slovakia
17. The name is absent
18. Konjunkturprognostiker unter Panik: Kommentar
19. The name is absent
20. Om Økonomi, matematik og videnskabelighed - et bud på provokation