On the Desirability of Taxing Charitable Contributions



directly affect contributions by either taxing or subsidizing them (through deduction
or credits).

The rationale for these results is straightforward. When constraint (11) is
binding (
μ2 > 0), there is an excess provision of public good. In this case, the
government employs the tax on contributions in order to shift resources from public
good provision towards redistribution. In contrast, when constraint (11) is not binding
(
μ2 = 0), then the government is indifferent, at the margin, between allocating its
revenues to the transfer (
T) or the public good (g). Because a tax on contributions
shifts resources from the public good to the transfer, there is no social gain or cost
generated by such a tax. These results suggest that the reason for taxing status-driven
contributions derives from the fact that the contributions themselves cannot be readily
translated into redistribution, whereas the tax revenues can be.12

5. Conclusions

The conventional practice is to render a favorable tax treatment for charitable
contributions, either through deductions or credits. The economic rationale for this
practice is essentially
Pigouvian: contributions for the financing of public goods
generate a positive externality. In this paper, we point out that contributions may be
also driven by a status-signaling motive. Therefore, as a pure signal, contributions
generate also a negative externality. Moreover, contributions may be employed by the
government in order to sort out the wealthy, and enhance redistribution.

Both considerations challenge the conventional practice. Naturally, whether
and to what extent favorable tax treatment should be rendered to charitable
contributions crucially depends on the relative strength of the altruistic motive vis-à-

12 We thank an anonymous referee for this observation.

20



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Ventas callejeras y espacio público: efectos sobre el comercio de Bogotá
3. Knowledge and Learning in Complex Urban Renewal Projects; Towards a Process Design
4. The name is absent
5. Economic Evaluation of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), CHERE Working Paper 2007/6
6. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ALTERNATIVE ECONOMETRIC PACKAGES: AN APPLICATION TO ITALIAN DEPOSIT INTEREST RATES
7. Indirect Effects of Pesticide Regulation and the Food Quality Protection Act
8. MULTIPLE COMPARISONS WITH THE BEST: BAYESIAN PRECISION MEASURES OF EFFICIENCY RANKINGS
9. Technological progress, organizational change and the size of the Human Resources Department
10. Healthy state, worried workers: North Carolina in the world economy
11. The name is absent
12. Analyse des verbraucherorientierten Qualitätsurteils mittels assoziativer Verfahren am Beispiel von Schweinefleisch und Kartoffeln
13. Centre for Longitudinal Studies
14. Une Gestion des ressources humaines à l'interface des organisations : vers une GRH territoriale ?
15. Endogenous Heterogeneity in Strategic Models: Symmetry-breaking via Strategic Substitutes and Nonconcavities
16. Temporary Work in Turbulent Times: The Swedish Experience
17. Synthesis and biological activity of α-galactosyl ceramide KRN7000 and galactosyl (α1→2) galactosyl ceramide
18. The Triangular Relationship between the Commission, NRAs and National Courts Revisited
19. Gender stereotyping and wage discrimination among Italian graduates
20. The Importance of Global Shocks for National Policymakers: Rising Challenges for Central Banks