Table 3
Flows that Contain Endogenous and Exogenous Components.
Description |
Variable |
Flow from employment to unemployment; job destruction |
FEUV |
Total flow from unemployment to employment |
FUE |
Total outflow from unemployment |
UO |
Total outflow from employment |
EO |
Total inflow to unemployment |
UI |
Total inflow to employment |
EI |
Table 4
Numerical values for baseline model (*=Number of persons/jobs x 1000, annual
averages).
Variable |
Value |
Variable |
Value |
U* |
750 |
Feu * |
600 |
FENV * |
300 |
Fuev * |
200 |
FNEV * |
400 |
Feuv * |
300 |
E* |
8,600 |
UO * |
4,600 |
V* |
75 |
r |
0.03 |
θ |
0.9 |
c |
0.9 |
α |
0.5 |
EO * |
4,200 |
V I* |
600 |
τ |
0.08 |
VOU* |
200 |
У |
1 |
VOEX* |
400 |
b |
0.3wss |
rate to 5% and has no participants in ALMPs. This unemployment target is
a substantial reduction from the baseline rate of nearly 8%, and is a target
that will be difficult for any method to achieve.
The input to the model (or control) is the proportion of the long-term un-
employed on ALMPs (λ). The control target is zero. There is no constraint
within the model on this proportion so the control method should incorporate
a realistic constraint. We use the constraint of 0 ≤ λ ≤ 0.5 so that a maxi-
mum of 50% of the long-term unemployed can participate in ALMPs in any
one month.
We follow the convention of using a quadratic objective function where the
optimization aims to reduce the sum of squared deviations from the output
(unemployment) and control (λ) targets. The deviations are weighted and we
More intriguing information
1. Legal Minimum Wages and the Wages of Formal and Informal Sector Workers in Costa Rica2. Social Balance Theory
3. AN IMPROVED 2D OPTICAL FLOW SENSOR FOR MOTION SEGMENTATION
4. The Demand for Specialty-Crop Insurance: Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard
5. Distortions in a multi-level co-financing system: the case of the agri-environmental programme of Saxony-Anhalt
6. The name is absent
7. EMU: some unanswered questions
8. Return Predictability and Stock Market Crashes in a Simple Rational Expectations Model
9. The name is absent
10. Benchmarking Regional Innovation: A Comparison of Bavaria, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland