4.4 Tilted normal alternative
Let h(x) be a positive valued, scalar function satisfying h(0) = 1 and
1, and consider the tilted normal density
dh(0) _
dx
f(y; β, σ, κ, λ)=
1κ λ
σqκλ)φ(u) 6u3- 3u■•-u4- 6u2+3)
where u = ( Y — β)∣σ and
which is assumed to exist. Taking h(x) = |x +1| yields a density compa-
rable to the first two terms of an Edgeworth expansion. Let Fκ,λ be the
distribution corresponding to f(y;0, 1, κ, λ). Then, as κ, λ → 0, the first
four moments of Fκ,λ are (see Appendix C.3)
q(κ,λ) = EΦ
hh K(u3 — 3u)
6u2 +
3) ,
EFκ,λ(Y)=0+o(κ,λ),
EFκ,λ (Y2) = 1 + o(κ,λ), (15)
EFκ,λ (Y3) = κ + o(κ,λ),
E-. (Y4) =3 + λ + o(κ,λ),
from which κ and λ have an interpretation as skewness and (excess-)kurtosis
parameters. Our interest in this distribution lies in the fact that the score
test for κ = λ = 0 is in fact the Jarque-Bera test. Thus, under a sequence
of local alternatives
Hn : Y ~ Fn = Fκ,λ,
with κ = k/yfn and λ = l∣y∕n, the IM test with ML estimator is optimal.
We show in Appendix C.3 that, under Hn,
T →d χq2 (δ),
with non-centrality parameter
k2 l2
δ = τ + 2i
for all M-estimators of scale.
17
More intriguing information
1. The use of formal education in Denmark 1980-19922. The name is absent
3. How Low Business Tax Rates Attract Multinational Headquarters: Municipality-Level Evidence from Germany
4. The name is absent
5. The Composition of Government Spending and the Real Exchange Rate
6. Globalization and the benefits of trade
7. The name is absent
8. REVITALIZING FAMILY FARM AGRICULTURE
9. A Unified Model For Developmental Robotics
10. Comparison of Optimal Control Solutions in a Labor Market Model