Fairchild and Aubin
353
Table 4: |
Benefit to Food Processing Sub-Sector of Own Country Country and Total.___________________________ | |||
Country |
Canada |
United States ^st £nd %______ |
Mexico |
Total ^st 2∏d %________ |
Large Gain |
71 87 |
30 25 |
100100 |
54 59 |
Small Gain |
24 13 |
60 75 |
— — |
39 41 |
No Change |
— — |
5 — |
— — |
2 — |
Small Loss |
— — |
— — |
— — |
— — |
Large Loss |
— — |
— — |
— — |
— — |
Don’t Know |
6 — |
5 —_____ |
— — |
5 —________ |
Source: Compiled from response data.
tion of which country(s) has a competitive advantage or disadvantage in par-
ticular sub-sectors.
Benefits to the Food Processing Sub-sector
In the first report card, respondents from both Canada and Mexico in-
dicated that their food processing sub-sector had benefitted from NAFTA with
71 percent of Canadians and 100 Percent of Mexicans indicating a large gain
(Table 4). Twenty-four percent of Canadians felt there had been a small ben-
efit. Respondents from the U.S. also believed that their food processing sub-
sector had benefitted, but only 30 percent thought there had been a large gain
compared to 60 percent who indicated a small gain. Overall, 95 percent of
those participating in the first report card thought NAFTA had been a large (54
percent) or small (39 percent) benefit to their food processing sub-sector.
The second report card did not result in any significant changes in the
all-country responses, however, there were changes in both Canada and the
United States (Table 4). Canadian respondents indicating a large gain to the
food processing sub-sector increased from 71 to 87 percent, while Americans
shifted some from the large-gain, no-change, and don’t know categories to the
small-gain category. Mexicans remained steadfast in their belief that NAFTA
had been a large benefit to their food processing sub-sector. Several factors
may lie behind these responses. Canada and Mexico may have competitive
advantages in food processing or at least they may focus on the food processing
More intriguing information
1. Convergence in TFP among Italian Regions - Panel Unit Roots with Heterogeneity and Cross Sectional Dependence2. Inflation and Inflation Uncertainty in the Euro Area
3. Une nouvelle vision de l'économie (The knowledge society: a new approach of the economy)
4. Monetary Discretion, Pricing Complementarity and Dynamic Multiple Equilibria
5. Implementation of the Ordinal Shapley Value for a three-agent economy
6. Changing spatial planning systems and the role of the regional government level; Comparing the Netherlands, Flanders and England
7. The name is absent
8. El Mercosur y la integración económica global
9. Dynamic Explanations of Industry Structure and Performance
10. Multifunctionality of Agriculture: An Inquiry Into the Complementarity Between Landscape Preservation and Food Security