AGRICULTURAL TRADE LIBERALIZATION UNDER NAFTA: REPORTING ON THE REPORT CARD



354


NAFTA - Report Card on Agriculture

Table 5: Benefit to Beverage Processing Sub-sector of Own Country
from NAFTA--Percent Response for Each Report Card by
__________________
Country and Total._________________________________

Country

Report Card

Canada
^st 2nd

United States

ιst 2nd

Mexico
st 2nd

Total

∙^st 2nd

Response

%

%

%

%

Large Gain

41 27

5 6

50 —

24 15

Small Gain

29 67

35 75

25 67

32 71

No Change

6 —

15 —

— —

10 —

Small Loss

— —

— —

— —

— —

Large Loss

— —

— —

— —

— —

Don’t Know

24 7

45 19_______

25 33

34 15____________

Source: Compiled from response data.

industry in their export sector more than does the United States. It may also be
a large country∕small county issue.

Benefits to the Beverage Processing Sub-sector

A great deal of uncertainty across countries was evident in the first
report card on the beverage processing sub-sector, as 34 percent overall, and
24, 45, and 25 percent of respondents from Canada, United States and Mexico,
respectively, did not know what the impact of NAFTA had been (Table 5). This
may reflect a general lack of knowledge among workshop participants about
the beverage processing sub-sector. Of those offering an opinion, the majority
of Canadians and Mexicans felt there had been a large gain, while the majority
of Americans believed there had been a small gain with the remainder indicat-
ing either a large gain or no change.

The second report card witnessed a much higher percent (up from 32
to 72 percent overall) indicating a small gain to the beverage. This increase
came from decreases in the large-benefit, no-change, and don’t-know catego-
ries. All three countries registered dramatic shifts to the small-gain category.
Apparently considerable learning occurred during the workshop.

Benefits to the Grains and Oilseeds Sub-sector

On the question of NAFTA’s benefit to one’s own grains and oilseeds
sub-sector, Canadian responses in the first report card all fell in the large-gain
(47 percent) and small-gain (53 percent) categories, compared to 15 and 55



More intriguing information

1. Industrial districts, innovation and I-district effect: territory or industrial specialization?
2. Labour Market Flexibility and Regional Unemployment Rate Dynamics: Spain (1980-1995)
3. The name is absent
4. THE WAEA -- WHICH NICHE IN THE PROFESSION?
5. The name is absent
6. Heterogeneity of Investors and Asset Pricing in a Risk-Value World
7. The name is absent
8. Artificial neural networks as models of stimulus control*
9. The name is absent
10. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in patients with ICDs and Pacemakers
11. Notes on an Endogenous Growth Model with two Capital Stocks II: The Stochastic Case
12. Strategic monetary policy in a monetary union with non-atomistic wage setters
13. The role of statin drugs in combating cardiovascular diseases
14. Standards behaviours face to innovation of the entrepreneurships of Beira Interior
15. Can genetic algorithms explain experimental anomalies? An application to common property resources
16. Higher education funding reforms in England: the distributional effects and the shifting balance of costs
17. The duration of fixed exchange rate regimes
18. The name is absent
19. The name is absent
20. References