Table 5: Workplace Organization and Practices and Wage Dispersiona - NES 1996
(Continued)
Specificationsb |
(1) |
(2) |
(3) |
(3) Manuf. |
(3) |
Computer Use % Managers |
-0.101 |
-0.104 |
-0.049 |
-0.119 | |
(0.083) |
(0.082) |
(0.097) |
(0.115) | ||
% Others |
0.137* |
0.128* |
0.153** |
0.079 | |
(0.073) |
(0.071) |
(0.075) |
(0.093) | ||
Workplace Organization # Management Levels |
0.007* |
0.006* |
0.005*** |
0.015 | |
(0.004) |
(0.004) |
(0.001) |
(0.018) | ||
# Wkrs/Supervisor |
0.000 |
-0.000 |
0.000 |
-0.000 | |
(0.001) |
(0.001) |
(0.001) |
(0.002) | ||
Benchmarking |
0.051 |
0.051 |
-0.020 |
0.140* | |
(0.047) |
(0.050) |
(0.048) |
(0.075) | ||
Re-engineering |
-0.023 |
-0.100* |
0.021 |
0.006 | |
(0.049) |
(0.050) |
(0.041) |
(0.081) | ||
Ft-lines Team/meetings Training |
-0.066 |
-0.073 |
-0.055 |
-0.085 | |
(0.049) |
(0.051) |
(0.047) |
(0.070) | ||
Pay Stock Option-Profit Sharing |
-0.060 |
-0.056 |
-0.008 |
-0.065 | |
(0.058) |
(0.056) |
(0.041) |
(0.089) | ||
Involvement Meeting (% wkrs) |
-0.059 |
0.022 |
-0.146** | ||
(0.055) |
(0.053) |
(0.086) | |||
Team (% wkrs) |
0.099 |
-0.030 |
0.190* | ||
(0.077) |
(0.089) |
(0.112) | |||
Job Rotation (% wkrs) |
-0.006 |
0.075 |
-0.027 | ||
(0.073) |
(0.067) |
(0.146) | |||
^^R2 |
0.233 |
0.333 |
0.343 |
0.265 |
0.475 |
N______________________ |
735 |
648 |
648 |
476 |
172 |
a-The dependent variable is the log of the ratio of average wages of managers and production
workers.
b-Also include industry and firm-size dummies. Standard errors computed using the White
correction. 1% significance level: ***. 5% significance level: **. 10% significance level: *.
27
More intriguing information
1. PROTECTING CONTRACT GROWERS OF BROILER CHICKEN INDUSTRY2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Fighting windmills? EU industrial interests and global climate negotiations
5. The name is absent
6. Why Managers Hold Shares of Their Firms: An Empirical Analysis
7. A Critical Examination of the Beliefs about Learning a Foreign Language at Primary School
8. Innovation Trajectories in Honduras’ Coffee Value Chain. Public and Private Influence on the Use of New Knowledge and Technology among Coffee Growers
9. Foreign Direct Investment and Unequal Regional Economic Growth in China
10. The name is absent