Table 8 - Estimations for S&P: two sub-periods
________Pooled OLS________ |
Random Effects |
Fixed Effects | ||||
1996-2000 |
2001-2005 |
1996-2000 |
2001-2005 |
1996-2000 |
2001-2005 | |
Constant |
3.744*** |
1.648 |
7.496*** |
8.006*** |
10.519*** |
10.079*** |
(2.41) |
(1.12) |
(13.57) |
(15.63) |
(225.94) |
(21.00) | |
GDP per capita |
3.159*** |
0.629*** |
2.059*** |
0.876*** |
2.063*** |
1.566*** |
(4.86) |
(1.95) |
(3.44) |
(4.17) |
(3.35) |
(8.05) | |
GDP per capita Avg. |
0.562*** |
0.896*** | ||||
(2.73) |
(4.54) | |||||
GDP growth |
4.236 |
6.115 |
5.864** |
4.559 |
7.955** |
2.715 |
(1.06) |
(1.50) |
(1.88) |
(1.17) |
(2.25) |
(0.61) | |
GDP growth Avg. | ||||||
Unemployment |
0.109*** |
-0.003 |
0.080** |
-0.047 | ||
(2.89) |
(-0.06) |
(1.85) |
(-0.85) | |||
Unemployment Avg. |
-0.036*** |
0.006 | ||||
(-2.16) |
(0.40) | |||||
Inflation |
-0.457*** |
-6.513*** |
-0.129*** |
-1.024 |
-0.156*** |
-0.219 |
(-2.86) |
(-4.33) |
(-2.81) |
(-0.81) |
(-3.15) |
(-0.18) | |
Inflation Avg. |
-0.617*** |
-6.692*** |
-0.407* |
-1.012 | ||
(-3.49) |
(-4.41) |
(-1.84) |
(-0.79) | |||
Gov Debt |
-0.029*** |
-0.024*** |
-0.041*** |
-0.020* |
-0.038*** |
-0.015 |
(-2.71) |
(-3.35) |
(-4.53) |
(-1.91) |
(-3.47) |
(-1.07) | |
Gov Debt Avg. |
-0.008* |
-0.018*** |
-0.014** |
-0.013** | ||
(-1.76) |
(-4.84) |
(-2.16) |
(-2.24) | |||
Gov Balance |
5.140 |
6.695 |
3.849 |
8.296** |
3.144 |
7.047* |
(1.17) |
(1.63) |
(1.23) |
(2.18) |
(0.82) |
(1.88) | |
Gov Balance Avg. |
9.078** |
-3.677 | ||||
(2.20) |
(-0.83) | |||||
Gov Effectiveness |
0.359* |
-0.074 |
0.493** |
0.572* | ||
(1.71) |
(-0.29) |
(2.41) |
(1.80) | |||
Gov Effectiveness Avg. |
2.098*** |
1.918*** |
2.433*** |
2.922*** | ||
(9.34) |
(8.44) |
(6.23) |
(8.48) | |||
External Debt |
0.003 |
-0.008** |
0.002 |
-0.008** | ||
(0.81) |
(-2.46) |
(0.79) |
(-2.13) | |||
External Debt Avg. |
-0.007*** |
-0.007*** |
-0.006** |
-0.010** | ||
(-4.16) |
(-3.90) |
(-2.03) |
(-2.44) | |||
Current Account |
-7.098** |
-0.304 |
-5.781** |
-0.867 | ||
(-2.30) |
(-0.09) |
(-2.37) |
(-0.31) | |||
Current Account Avg. | ||||||
Reserves | ||||||
Reserves Avg. |
1.896*** |
1.397*** |
1.675 |
1.618** | ||
(3.26) |
(2.87) |
(1.51) |
(1.97) | |||
Def 1 |
-0.845*** |
-1.256** |
-1.504*** |
-1.169** |
-1.588 |
-0.941 |
(-2.60) |
(-5.40) |
(-4.71) |
(-2.37) |
(-4.65) |
(-1.06) | |
Def 2 | ||||||
EU (2) |
1.001*** |
0.960*** |
0.816 |
0.663*** | ||
(3.50) |
(4.67) |
(1.60) |
(3.45) | |||
IND |
2.560*** |
1.789*** |
3.901*** |
2.513*** | ||
(6.15) |
(4.92) |
(4.47) |
(3.53) | |||
LAC |
-0.882 |
-0.674*** | ||||
(-3.98) |
(-2.82) | |||||
R2 |
0.944 |
0.967 |
0.939 |
0.959 |
0.990 |
0.991 |
Countries |
64 |
65 |
63 |
65 |
67 |
74 |
Observations |
290 |
278 |
288 |
277 |
308 |
349 |
Hausman Test $________ |
7.84 (0.644) |
16.86 (0.112) |
Notes: White diagonal standard errors & covariance (d.f. corrected). The t statistics are in parentheses. *, **, *** - statistically
significant at the 10, 5, and 1 per cent. $ The null is that RE estimation is consistent and therefore preferable to fixed effects. The test
statistic is to be compared to a Qui-Square with 10 and 11 degrees of freedom respectively (the variable EU (2) is time invariant in
the second sample) . The p-value is in brackets.
40
More intriguing information
1. Evaluating Consumer Usage of Nutritional Labeling: The Influence of Socio-Economic Characteristics2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Disturbing the fiscal theory of the price level: Can it fit the eu-15?
5. The name is absent
6. Mergers under endogenous minimum quality standard: a note
7. Urban Green Space Policies: Performance and Success Conditions in European Cities
8. The name is absent
9. Moi individuel et moi cosmique Dans la pensee de Romain Rolland
10. The Role of Immigration in Sustaining the Social Security System: A Political Economy Approach