Table 9 - Estimations for Fitch: two sub-periods
|
________Pooled OLS________ |
Random Effects |
Fixed Effects | ||||
|
1996-2000 |
2001-2005 |
1996-2000 |
2001-2005 |
1996-2000 |
2001-2005 | |
|
Constant |
4.953*** |
1.732 |
7.160*** |
7.783*** |
11.149*** |
10.637*** |
|
(2.96) |
(1.15) |
(12.04) |
(14.13) |
(144.80) |
(17.37) | |
|
GDP per capita |
2.201*** |
1.030*** |
1.881*** |
1.197*** |
2.014*** |
1.354*** |
|
(2.92) |
(3.02) |
(3.61) |
(6.00) |
(4.00) |
(5.92) | |
|
GDP per capita Avg. |
0.403* |
0.960*** | ||||
|
(1.93) |
(4.94) | |||||
|
GDP growth |
-2.392 |
3.377 | ||||
|
(-0.79) |
(0.88) | |||||
|
GDP growth Avg. | ||||||
|
Unemployment | ||||||
|
Unemployment Avg. | ||||||
|
Inflation |
-0.233** |
-7.223*** |
-0.098 |
-1.086 | ||
|
(-2.12) |
(-5.06) |
(-1.01) |
(-0.73) | |||
|
Inflation Avg. |
-0.364*** |
-7.316*** | ||||
|
(-3.20) |
(-4.97) | |||||
|
Gov Debt |
-0.046*** |
-0.027*** |
-0.039*** |
-0.021* |
-0.036*** |
-0.015 |
|
(-4.19) |
(-3.99) |
(-5.81) |
(-1.85) |
(-4.09) |
(-0.78) | |
|
Gov Debt Avg. |
-0.008* |
-0.010** | ||||
|
(-1.67) |
(-2.24) | |||||
|
Gov Balance |
0.852 |
6.226* | ||||
|
(0.22) |
(1.84) | |||||
|
Gov Balance Avg. |
12.422*** |
0.503 | ||||
|
(3.26) |
(0.12) | |||||
|
Gov Effectiveness |
1.490*** |
-0.907** |
0.714*** |
0.298 |
0.545** |
0.294 |
|
(3.60) |
(-2.09) |
(3.26) |
(1.04) |
(2.15) |
(1.15) | |
|
Gov Effectiveness Avg. |
1.958*** |
1.461*** |
2.628*** |
2.771*** | ||
|
(8.59) |
(6.37) |
(6.28) |
(8.20) | |||
|
External Debt |
-0.001 |
-0.008*** |
-0.001 |
-0.008** |
-0.001 |
-0.008* |
|
(-0.28) |
(-2.76) |
(-0.23) |
(-2.26) |
(-0.22) |
(-1.78) | |
|
External Debt Avg. |
-0.008*** |
-0.012*** |
-0.010*** |
-0.014*** | ||
|
(-4.34) |
(-5.35) |
(-2.68) |
(-3.51) | |||
|
Current Account | ||||||
|
Current Account Avg. | ||||||
|
Reserves | ||||||
|
Reserves Avg. |
2.313*** |
2.225*** |
2.557** |
2.696*** | ||
|
(3.42) |
(4.16) |
(2.40) |
(3.45) | |||
|
Def 1 |
-0.717** |
-1.409** |
-1.440*** |
-1.338** |
-1.848** |
-0.970 |
|
(-2.22) |
(-5.32) |
(-3.02) |
(-2.36) |
(-2.43) |
(-0.97) | |
|
Def 2 | ||||||
|
EU |
0.843*** |
0.959*** |
0.841* |
0.579** | ||
|
(2.92) |
(4.45) |
(1.67) |
(2.34) | |||
|
IND |
2.953*** |
1.359*** |
2.883*** |
2.146*** | ||
|
(5.48) |
(2.89) |
(2.96) |
(3.39) | |||
|
LAC |
-1.017*** |
-0.917*** | ||||
|
(-3.84) |
(-4.17) | |||||
|
R2 |
0.943 |
0.969 |
0.932 |
0.957 |
0.990 |
0.993 |
|
Countries |
54 |
58 |
54 |
58 |
54 |
58 |
|
Observations |
235 |
246 |
235 |
246 |
235 |
246 |
|
Hausman Test $________ |
6.95 (0.325) |
11.25 (0.128) | ||||
Notes: White diagonal standard errors & covariance (d.f. corrected). The t statistics are in parentheses. *, **, *** - statistically
significant at the 10, 5, and 1 per cent. $ The null is that RE estimation is consistent and therefore preferable to fixed effects. The test
statistic is to be compared to a Qui-Square with 8 and 7 degrees of freedom respectively (the variable EU (2) is time invariant in the
second sample). The p-value is in brackets.
41
More intriguing information
1. Healthy state, worried workers: North Carolina in the world economy2. The effect of classroom diversity on tolerance and participation in England, Sweden and Germany
3. The name is absent
4. The InnoRegio-program: a new way to promote regional innovation networks - empirical results of the complementary research -
5. The name is absent
6. A parametric approach to the estimation of cointegration vectors in panel data
7. Internationalization of Universities as Internationalization of Bildung
8. Restricted Export Flexibility and Risk Management with Options and Futures
9. The name is absent
10. An Economic Analysis of Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Consumption: Implications for Overweight and Obesity among Higher- and Lower-Income Consumers