The name is absent



Table 6

(a) Probit estimates of marginal effects evaluated at the means of explanatory variables: those who thought that immigration would depress wages on average

EU

AT

DE

DK

ES

FI

FR

GR

IE

IT

LU

NL

PT

SE

UK

employ

-0.002

-0.172 **

-0.069

0.000

-0.108

0.002

0.086

0.002

0.021

0.058

-0.074

0.083

0.027

0.013

-0.002

0.038

0.073

0.084

0.149

0.121

0.067

0.144

0.020

0.072

0.121

0.149

0.093

0.042

0.138

0.058

unemploy

0.090 ***

0.018

0.102

0.151

0.137

0.044

0.102

-0.014

0.002

0.147 *

0.026

0.138

-0.117

-0.092

-0.030

0.030

0.125

0.064

0.166

0.092

0.038

0.084

0.063

0.082

0.081

0.249

0.188

0.094

0.084

0.069

isb

0.004

0.072 *

-0.003

-0.131

0.004

-0.065

0.021

0.011 **

-0.071 *

-0.028

0.237 **

0.008

0.008

-0.022

-0.054

0.013

0.037

0.024

0.082

0.032

0.042

0.025

0.005

0.038

0.158

0.092

0.051

0.014

0.052

0.051

relinc

-0.005

-0.008

0.008

-0.023

0.030

-0.024

-0.019

0.001

-0.008

-0.072

-0.073

0.014

0.018 **

0.083 *

0.002

0.009

0.015

0.026

0.060

0.021

0.020

0.016

0.008

0.033

0.050

0.071

0.047

0.009

0.040

0.019

ed0

0.100 *

0.214

t

t

0.154

-0.162

0.039

0.009

0.201

-0.036

0.245

-0.013

0.038

f(2)

f(1)

0.049

0.109

0.098

0.132

0.109

0.039

0.158

0.153

0.196

0.264

0.104

ed1

0.055 **

0.025

0.126 **

0.303 ***

0.076

0.003

0.027

0.013

0.063

-0.015

0.033

0.049

-0.099 ***

0.155

0.003

0.026

0.050

0.054

0.059

0.082

0.038

0.062

0.024

0.047

0.114

0.087

0.049

0.019

0.093

0.038

ed3

-0.141 ***

-0.059

-0.052

-0.175 **

0.021

-0.064 ***

-0.237 ***

-0.093 ***

-0.052

-0.114

-0.170

-0.142 *

-0.162 *

-0.083

-0.282 ***

0.036

0.125

0.052

0.078

0.110

0.017

0.037

0.038

0.088

0.249

0.125

0.088

0.092

0.123

0.070

media

-0.010

0.005

-0.009

0.018

0.035

0.000

-0.018

-0.003

0.010

-0.075

0.020

0.003

-0.011

0.010

-0.021

0.009

0.039

0.023

0.039

0.032

0.021

0.026

0.012

0.019

0.051

0.021

0.022

0.028

0.026

0.014

friend1

-0.121 ***

-0.001

-0.144 ***

0.047

-0.178 **

-0.132 **

-0.137 ***

-0.032

-0.006

-0.230 **

0.018

-0.056

-0.156 ***

0.033

-0.019

0.019

0.072

0.027

0.073

0.074

0.062

0.051

0.020

0.058

0.110

0.101

0.073

0.067

0.090

0.048

friend2

-0.143 ***

-0.296 ***

-0.139 ***

-0.299 ***

-0.136

-0.197 **

-0.147 *

-0.064

-0.134 *

-0.317

-0.006

-0.171 *

-0.251 *

0.121

-0.009

0.033

0.085

0.039

0.097

0.116

0.096

0.081

0.058

0.066

0.155

0.111

0.095

0.134

0.079

0.089

racist

0.088 ***

0.002

0.103 ***

0.107 **

-0.138 ***

-0.013

0.075

-0.001

0.089 **

0.184 **

-0.093

0.198 ***

0.074 **

0.154 ***

0.142 ***

0.018

0.063

0.035

0.044

0.027

0.022

0.053

0.018

0.037

0.076

0.057

0.054

0.039

0.044

0.036

citizen

0.087

0.341

0.232 ***

-0.284 *

f(5)

0.264 ***

-0.077

0.165 **

-0.052

f(1)

0.247 **

-0.009

0.092

-0.188

0.047

0.055

0.219

0.066

0.122

0.082

0.105

0.100

0.102

0.110

0.215

0.187

0.285

0.198

ethnic

-0.092 *

0.030

-0.189 **

0.194

-0.113

-0.214

0.004

-0.093 ***

0.190

t

-0.295 *

0.066

s(4)

0.333

-0.086

0.049

0.090

0.089

0.235

0.120

0.182

0.164

0.028

0.340

0.135

0.106

0.413

0.083

fparent

-0.139 ***

0.137 **

0.026

0.036

0.196 **

-0.058

-0.248 ***

-0.094 ***

0.142

-0.377 *

0.000

-0.058

-0.003

-0.076

-0.244 ***

0.042

0.053

0.057

0.120

0.074

0.057

0.075

0.040

0.104

0.157

0.099

0.103

0.176

0.094

0.078

female

0.023

0.025

-0.036

-0.087

0.015

-0.019

0.095 **

-0.024

0.003

0.145 *

0.047

0.008

0.054

0.042

0.017

0.018

0.051

0.031

0.065

0.050

0.036

0.041

0.023

0.042

0.078

0.081

0.059

0.055

0.061

0.045

age

0.001 *

0.002

0.001 **

0.000

0.000

0.005 ***

0.002

0.001 ***

-0.002 *

0.004

-0.001

-0.002 *

0.005 ***

-0.002

0.000

0.000

0.002

0.000

0.003

0.002

0.001

0.002

0.000

0.001

0.004

0.002

0.001

0.001

0.003

0.001

log pseudolikelihood

-3882.747

-200.353

-483.255

-141.002

-158.387

-382.446

-321.579

-342.365

-338.664

-89.348

-144.803

-218.835

-226.539

-119.628

-335.060

McFadden's (1974) LRI

0.095

0.094

0.051

0.114

0.064

0.068

0.102

0.096

0.031

0.134

0.098

0.062

0.101

0.094

0.118

R2p

0.168

0.061

0.139

0.142

0.189

0.057

0.232

0.000

0.057

0.250

0.080

0.007

-0.007

0.052

0.158

Sum of PCP

1.278

1.173

1.185

1.217

1.251

1.141

1.274

1.049

1.115

1.277

1.174

1.104

1.102

1.101

1.260

obs.

6311.000______

375.000______

735.000______

231.000______

259.000______

656.000______

519.000______

1007.000______

517.000______

149.000______

233.000______

362.000______

423.000______

242.000______

590.000

t All non-missing observations are 0, and the corresponding variable is dropped in estimation.

s(n) n observations predict success perfectly, and the corresponding variable and the n observations are dropped in estimation.
f(n) n observations predict failure perfectly, and the corresponding variable and the n observations are dropped in estimation.

* 10%   ** 5%   *** 1%

The three goodness-of-fit measures are described in Verbeek


(2004: 194-197).


Sum of PCP is the sum of the proportions of correct predictions for anti


1 and anti = 0.


Sampling weights provided by ESS are applied in maximum likelihood estimation.

For EU, a further weight adjustment is made to reflect the population size of each country.

Estimated standard errors are based on the assumption that observations are not necessarily independent within each region of a country, but are independent across regions of the country.

For EU, 13 country dummies are included with UK being the reference.



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. On Evolution of God-Seeking Mind
3. CAPACITAÇÃO GERENCIAL DE AGRICULTORES FAMILIARES: UMA PROPOSTA METODOLÓGICA DE EXTENSÃO RURAL
4. The name is absent
5. The Impact of Minimum Wages on Wage Inequality and Employment in the Formal and Informal Sector in Costa Rica
6. MULTIMODAL SEMIOTICS OF SPIRITUAL EXPERIENCES: REPRESENTING BELIEFS, METAPHORS, AND ACTIONS
7. The name is absent
8. Towards a Mirror System for the Development of Socially-Mediated Skills
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent
11. TLRP: academic challenges for moral purposes
12. Secondary stress in Brazilian Portuguese: the interplay between production and perception studies
13. The name is absent
14. Tax Increment Financing for Optimal Open Space Preservation: an Economic Inquiry
15. A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON UNDERINVESTMENT IN AGRICULTURAL R&D
16. On the job rotation problem
17. How does an infant acquire the ability of joint attention?: A Constructive Approach
18. Co-ordinating European sectoral policies against the background of European Spatial Development
19. The name is absent
20. The name is absent