5th and 8th grade pupils’ and teachers’ perceptions of the relationships between teaching methods, classroom ethos, and positive affective attitudes towards learning mathematics in Japan



Table 7.1.6: Mean of frequency of deployment of teaching methods and affective attitude
promoted by teaching methods between pupils with higher and lower levels of perceived
mathematics performance at 8th grade_______________________________________________

Enjoyment__

Motivation _____

Sense of security

Sense qfprogress

Deployment

N____

M___

SD

N____

M

SD

N

M

SD

N____

M___

SD

N

M

SD

PW

_H__

464

3.00

1.39

463

2.80

1.33

463

2.59

1.20

463

2.87

1.28

462

1.34

.57

M

797

2.76

1.34

796

2.61

1.25

792

2.52

1.17

793

2.69

1.19

791

1.43

.62

J-___

895

2.79

1.37

890

2.63

1.29

886

2.51 і

1.23 j

887

2.75

1.30

889

1.44

.62

F=5.061, p<,01________

F=3.545, p<.05______

F=.750, p>.05

F-=2.971, p>.05

F=4.492, p<.05 _______

UC

^H

464

3.26

1.51

463

2.90

1.39

462

2.58

1.26

462

2.52

1.17

462

1.48

.77

M

796

2.94

1.49

795

2.83

1.37

791

2.53

1.23

791

2.51

1.17

793

1.35

.66

J-__

895

3.03

1.54

889

2.95

1.41

885

2.69

1.33

885

2.65

1.27

889

1.26

.61

F=6.649, p<.01

F=1.522, p>.05

F=3.603, p<.05

F=3.456, p<.05

F=17.075, p<.01

RT

^H

463

2.49

1.17

458

2.43

1.22

463

2.87

1.27

463

3.25

1.24

459

3.05

1.20

M

797

2.65

1.18

794

2.50

1.15

792

2.82

1.22

793

3.12

1.21

786

3.10

1.16

J.__

894

2.66

1.20

890

2.42

1.17

886

2.73

1.25

885

3.12

1.30

890

2.98

1,11

F=3.200, p<.05

F=1.106, p>.05

F=2.205, p>.05

F=1.993, p>.05

r F=2,231, p>.05

TE

H

464

3.41

1.23

463

3.25

1.21

463

3.54

1.17

462

3.95

1.02

457

4.26

.88

M

797

3.49

1.18

796

3.32

1.15

792

3.55

1.18

793

3,91

1.05

788

4.04

.95

J-__

895

3.25

1.28

889

3.06

1.28

886

3.29

1.28

887

3.68

1.17

889

3.84

1.10

F=8.640, p<.01

F=9.898, p<.01

F=11.296, p<.01

F=13.078, p<.01

F=27.014, p<.01

IW

H

464

3.37

1.25

462

3.58

1.26

463

3.83

1.19

463

3.95

1.10

460

4.06

.79

M

797

3.36

1.20

796

3.49

1.21

792

3.72

1.20

793

3.93

1.07

787

3.84

.90

J-__

895

3.06

1.31

890

3.07

1.32

886

3.33

1.33

887

3.59

1.24

887

3.72

.94

F=15.243, p<.01

F=33.081, p<.01

F=33.094, p<.01

F=23.355, p<.01

F=21.677, p<.01

IH

~H~~

464

2.99

1.33

463

3.40

1.33

462

3.67

1.31

463

4.14

1.09

459

3.25

1.11

M

797

3.01

1.26

796

3.30

1.32

792

3.55

1.26

792

4.08

1.09

790

3.18

1.06

J-__

895

2.92

1.37

890

3.14

1.39

886

3.38

1.40

887

3.92

1.21

885

2.96

1.10

F=1.008, p>.05

F=5.871, p<.01

F=8.053, p<.01

F=7.106, p<.01

F=13.404, p<.01

WD

~H~

464

2.63

1.20

463

2.49

1.19

463

2.50

1.15

463

2.57

1.21

455

1.88

.97

M

797

2.61

1.22

796

2.51

1.16

792

2.46

1.12

793

2.53

1.11

787

1.92

.94

Jz__

895

2.46

1.22

890

2.42

1.21

885

2.33

1.15

887

2.48

1.16

886

1.80

.92

F=4.590, p<.01

F=1.116, p>.05

F=4.586, p<.01

F=.938, p>.05__________

F=3.581, p<.05

GD

H

464

2.85

1.31

463

2.70

1.27

463

2.63

1.17

463

2.68

1.21

458

1.45

.69

M

797

2.74

1.26

796

2.68

1.25

792

2.60

1.18

792

2.62

1.14

784

1.57

.83

J-___

895

2.69

1.34

889

2.67

1.31

883

2.54

1.24

887

2,59

1.22

882

1.54

.76

F=2,107, p>.05

F=.074, p>.05__________

F=1.084, p>.05

F=.979, p>.05__________

F=3.411, p<.05



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Non Linear Contracting and Endogenous Buyer Power between Manufacturers and Retailers: Empirical Evidence on Food Retailing in France
3. The Response of Ethiopian Grain Markets to Liberalization
4. The name is absent
5. Trade Openness and Volatility
6. The name is absent
7. Governance Control Mechanisms in Portuguese Agricultural Credit Cooperatives
8. The Role of Land Retirement Programs for Management of Water Resources
9. Ventas callejeras y espacio público: efectos sobre el comercio de Bogotá
10. Non-causality in Bivariate Binary Panel Data