5th and 8th grade pupils’ and teachers’ perceptions of the relationships between teaching methods, classroom ethos, and positive affective attitudes towards learning mathematics in Japan



Table 7.1.6: Mean of frequency of deployment of teaching methods and affective attitude
promoted by teaching methods between pupils with higher and lower levels of perceived
mathematics performance at 8th grade_______________________________________________

Enjoyment__

Motivation _____

Sense of security

Sense qfprogress

Deployment

N____

M___

SD

N____

M

SD

N

M

SD

N____

M___

SD

N

M

SD

PW

_H__

464

3.00

1.39

463

2.80

1.33

463

2.59

1.20

463

2.87

1.28

462

1.34

.57

M

797

2.76

1.34

796

2.61

1.25

792

2.52

1.17

793

2.69

1.19

791

1.43

.62

J-___

895

2.79

1.37

890

2.63

1.29

886

2.51 і

1.23 j

887

2.75

1.30

889

1.44

.62

F=5.061, p<,01________

F=3.545, p<.05______

F=.750, p>.05

F-=2.971, p>.05

F=4.492, p<.05 _______

UC

^H

464

3.26

1.51

463

2.90

1.39

462

2.58

1.26

462

2.52

1.17

462

1.48

.77

M

796

2.94

1.49

795

2.83

1.37

791

2.53

1.23

791

2.51

1.17

793

1.35

.66

J-__

895

3.03

1.54

889

2.95

1.41

885

2.69

1.33

885

2.65

1.27

889

1.26

.61

F=6.649, p<.01

F=1.522, p>.05

F=3.603, p<.05

F=3.456, p<.05

F=17.075, p<.01

RT

^H

463

2.49

1.17

458

2.43

1.22

463

2.87

1.27

463

3.25

1.24

459

3.05

1.20

M

797

2.65

1.18

794

2.50

1.15

792

2.82

1.22

793

3.12

1.21

786

3.10

1.16

J.__

894

2.66

1.20

890

2.42

1.17

886

2.73

1.25

885

3.12

1.30

890

2.98

1,11

F=3.200, p<.05

F=1.106, p>.05

F=2.205, p>.05

F=1.993, p>.05

r F=2,231, p>.05

TE

H

464

3.41

1.23

463

3.25

1.21

463

3.54

1.17

462

3.95

1.02

457

4.26

.88

M

797

3.49

1.18

796

3.32

1.15

792

3.55

1.18

793

3,91

1.05

788

4.04

.95

J-__

895

3.25

1.28

889

3.06

1.28

886

3.29

1.28

887

3.68

1.17

889

3.84

1.10

F=8.640, p<.01

F=9.898, p<.01

F=11.296, p<.01

F=13.078, p<.01

F=27.014, p<.01

IW

H

464

3.37

1.25

462

3.58

1.26

463

3.83

1.19

463

3.95

1.10

460

4.06

.79

M

797

3.36

1.20

796

3.49

1.21

792

3.72

1.20

793

3.93

1.07

787

3.84

.90

J-__

895

3.06

1.31

890

3.07

1.32

886

3.33

1.33

887

3.59

1.24

887

3.72

.94

F=15.243, p<.01

F=33.081, p<.01

F=33.094, p<.01

F=23.355, p<.01

F=21.677, p<.01

IH

~H~~

464

2.99

1.33

463

3.40

1.33

462

3.67

1.31

463

4.14

1.09

459

3.25

1.11

M

797

3.01

1.26

796

3.30

1.32

792

3.55

1.26

792

4.08

1.09

790

3.18

1.06

J-__

895

2.92

1.37

890

3.14

1.39

886

3.38

1.40

887

3.92

1.21

885

2.96

1.10

F=1.008, p>.05

F=5.871, p<.01

F=8.053, p<.01

F=7.106, p<.01

F=13.404, p<.01

WD

~H~

464

2.63

1.20

463

2.49

1.19

463

2.50

1.15

463

2.57

1.21

455

1.88

.97

M

797

2.61

1.22

796

2.51

1.16

792

2.46

1.12

793

2.53

1.11

787

1.92

.94

Jz__

895

2.46

1.22

890

2.42

1.21

885

2.33

1.15

887

2.48

1.16

886

1.80

.92

F=4.590, p<.01

F=1.116, p>.05

F=4.586, p<.01

F=.938, p>.05__________

F=3.581, p<.05

GD

H

464

2.85

1.31

463

2.70

1.27

463

2.63

1.17

463

2.68

1.21

458

1.45

.69

M

797

2.74

1.26

796

2.68

1.25

792

2.60

1.18

792

2.62

1.14

784

1.57

.83

J-___

895

2.69

1.34

889

2.67

1.31

883

2.54

1.24

887

2,59

1.22

882

1.54

.76

F=2,107, p>.05

F=.074, p>.05__________

F=1.084, p>.05

F=.979, p>.05__________

F=3.411, p<.05



More intriguing information

1. ALTERNATIVE TRADE POLICIES
2. PEER-REVIEWED FINAL EDITED VERSION OF ARTICLE PRIOR TO PUBLICATION
3. AJAE Appendix: Willingness to Pay Versus Expected Consumption Value in Vickrey Auctions for New Experience Goods
4. Disturbing the fiscal theory of the price level: Can it fit the eu-15?
5. The name is absent
6. On the Integration of Digital Technologies into Mathematics Classrooms
7. The name is absent
8. Prizes and Patents: Using Market Signals to Provide Incentives for Innovations
9. Confusion and Reinforcement Learning in Experimental Public Goods Games
10. The Triangular Relationship between the Commission, NRAs and National Courts Revisited