5th and 8th grade pupils’ and teachers’ perceptions of the relationships between teaching methods, classroom ethos, and positive affective attitudes towards learning mathematics in Japan



Table 7.2.7: Mean scores and Standard Deviation of 8th graders’ motivation to learn
mathematics promoted by teaching methods according to their attribution styles of success in
mathematics learning_____________________________

Reading a textbook

Teacherexplanation

N

M__

SD

_N___

M___

SD

Ability

58

2.34

1.24

58

2.72

1.25

Effort_____________________

410

2.65

1.21

412

3.48

1.13

Luck________________

159

2.24

1.13

160

3.09

1.22

Support form teacher

196

2.64

1.13

196

3.71

1.01

Home support_______

207

2.49

1.17

208

3.08

1.18

Task easiness________

49

2.06

.97

49

2.86

1.15

ANOVA_________

F=4.986, p=. 000

F=14.'

85, p=.

000___

Table 7.2.8: Mean scores and Standard Deviation of 8th graders’ sense of security in learning
mathematics promoted by teaching methods according to their attribution styles of success in
mathematics learning______________________________________________

Reading a textbook

Teacher explanation

Individual work

N......

M__

SD

_N___

M

SD

N

M__

SD

Ability

58

2.88

1.35

58

3.21

1.39

58

4.03

1.20

Effort_____________________

409

3.02

1.24

409

3.71

1.11

409

3.95

1.17

Luck________________

160

2.56

1.17

160

3.18

1.23

160

3.49

1.28

Support form teacher

194

2.99

1.17

194

3.91

.98

194

3.58

1.09

Home support_______

208

2.79

1.23

208

3.37

1.20

208

3.72

1.12

Task easiness________

49

2.63

1.33

49

3.29

1.41

49

3.82

1.30

ANOVA_________

F=4.2'

7, p=. 001

F=11,278, p=. 000

F=5.484, p=. 000

Table 7.2.9: Mean scores and Standard Deviation of 8th graders’ sense of progress in learning
mathematics promoted by teaching methods according to their attribution styles of success in
mathematics learning______________________________________________

Reading a textbook

Teacherexplanation

Individual work_______

N

M

SD

N

M__

SD

_N___

M__

SD

Ability____________________

58

3.21

1.40

58

3.69

1.20

58

3.97

1.06

Effort_____________________

409

3.31

1.24

408

4.08

.97

409

4.10

1.02

Luck_______________

158

2.89

1.16

158

3.62

1.13

158

3.72

1.11

Support form teacher

196

3.29

1.20

196

4.19

.89

196

3.78

1.09

Home support_______

209

3.13

1.12

209

3.74

1.06

209

3.89

1.06

Task easiness________

49

2.76

1.25

49

3.86

1.06

49

3.94

1.13

ANOVA_________

F=4.461,p=. 000

F=9.459, p=. 000

F=4.2Z

12, p=. 001



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Linking Indigenous Social Capital to a Global Economy
3. Fiscal Sustainability Across Government Tiers
4. Asymmetric transfer of the dynamic motion aftereffect between first- and second-order cues and among different second-order cues
5. Literary criticism as such can perhaps be called the art of rereading.
6. Spatial Aggregation and Weather Risk Management
7. The name is absent
8. The Value of Cultural Heritage Sites in Armenia: Evidence From a Travel Cost Method Study
9. The name is absent
10. Passing the burden: corporate tax incidence in open economies
11. Geography, Health, and Demo-Economic Development
12. The name is absent
13. Reconsidering the value of pupil attitudes to studying post-16: a caution for Paul Croll
14. Workforce or Workfare?
15. Change in firm population and spatial variations: The case of Turkey
16. The name is absent
17. The Global Dimension to Fiscal Sustainability
18. The name is absent
19. Julkinen T&K-rahoitus ja sen vaikutus yrityksiin - Analyysi metalli- ja elektroniikkateollisuudesta
20. The name is absent