Table 7.2.7: Mean scores and Standard Deviation of 8th graders’ motivation to learn
mathematics promoted by teaching methods according to their attribution styles of success in
mathematics learning_____________________________
|
Reading a textbook |
Teacherexplanation | |||||
|
N |
M__ |
SD |
_N___ |
M___ |
SD | |
|
Ability |
58 |
2.34 |
1.24 |
58 |
2.72 |
1.25 |
|
Effort_____________________ |
410 |
2.65 |
1.21 |
412 |
3.48 |
1.13 |
|
Luck________________ |
159 |
2.24 |
1.13 |
160 |
3.09 |
1.22 |
|
Support form teacher |
196 |
2.64 |
1.13 |
196 |
3.71 |
1.01 |
|
Home support_______ |
207 |
2.49 |
1.17 |
208 |
3.08 |
1.18 |
|
Task easiness________ |
49 |
2.06 |
.97 |
49 |
2.86 |
1.15 |
|
ANOVA_________ |
F=4.986, p=. 000 |
F=14.' |
85, p=. |
000___ | ||
Table 7.2.8: Mean scores and Standard Deviation of 8th graders’ sense of security in learning
mathematics promoted by teaching methods according to their attribution styles of success in
mathematics learning______________________________________________
|
Reading a textbook |
Teacher explanation |
Individual work | |||||||
|
N...... |
M__ |
SD |
_N___ |
M |
SD |
N |
M__ |
SD | |
|
Ability |
58 |
2.88 |
1.35 |
58 |
3.21 |
1.39 |
58 |
4.03 |
1.20 |
|
Effort_____________________ |
409 |
3.02 |
1.24 |
409 |
3.71 |
1.11 |
409 |
3.95 |
1.17 |
|
Luck________________ |
160 |
2.56 |
1.17 |
160 |
3.18 |
1.23 |
160 |
3.49 |
1.28 |
|
Support form teacher |
194 |
2.99 |
1.17 |
194 |
3.91 |
.98 |
194 |
3.58 |
1.09 |
|
Home support_______ |
208 |
2.79 |
1.23 |
208 |
3.37 |
1.20 |
208 |
3.72 |
1.12 |
|
Task easiness________ |
49 |
2.63 |
1.33 |
49 |
3.29 |
1.41 |
49 |
3.82 |
1.30 |
|
ANOVA_________ |
F=4.2' |
7, p=. 001 |
F=11,278, p=. 000 |
F=5.484, p=. 000 | |||||
Table 7.2.9: Mean scores and Standard Deviation of 8th graders’ sense of progress in learning
mathematics promoted by teaching methods according to their attribution styles of success in
mathematics learning______________________________________________
|
Reading a textbook |
Teacherexplanation |
Individual work_______ | |||||||
|
N |
M |
SD |
N |
M__ |
SD |
_N___ |
M__ |
SD | |
|
Ability____________________ |
58 |
3.21 |
1.40 |
58 |
3.69 |
1.20 |
58 |
3.97 |
1.06 |
|
Effort_____________________ |
409 |
3.31 |
1.24 |
408 |
4.08 |
.97 |
409 |
4.10 |
1.02 |
|
Luck_______________ |
158 |
2.89 |
1.16 |
158 |
3.62 |
1.13 |
158 |
3.72 |
1.11 |
|
Support form teacher |
196 |
3.29 |
1.20 |
196 |
4.19 |
.89 |
196 |
3.78 |
1.09 |
|
Home support_______ |
209 |
3.13 |
1.12 |
209 |
3.74 |
1.06 |
209 |
3.89 |
1.06 |
|
Task easiness________ |
49 |
2.76 |
1.25 |
49 |
3.86 |
1.06 |
49 |
3.94 |
1.13 |
|
ANOVA_________ |
F=4.461,p=. 000 |
F=9.459, p=. 000 |
F=4.2Z |
12, p=. 001 | |||||
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. The Employment Impact of Differences in Dmand and Production
4. The name is absent
5. Female Empowerment: Impact of a Commitment Savings Product in the Philippines
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. Uncertain Productivity Growth and the Choice between FDI and Export
9. Cyclical Changes in Short-Run Earnings Mobility in Canada, 1982-1996
10. The name is absent