Table 7.2.7: Mean scores and Standard Deviation of 8th graders’ motivation to learn
mathematics promoted by teaching methods according to their attribution styles of success in
mathematics learning_____________________________
|
Reading a textbook |
Teacherexplanation | |||||
|
N |
M__ |
SD |
_N___ |
M___ |
SD | |
|
Ability |
58 |
2.34 |
1.24 |
58 |
2.72 |
1.25 |
|
Effort_____________________ |
410 |
2.65 |
1.21 |
412 |
3.48 |
1.13 |
|
Luck________________ |
159 |
2.24 |
1.13 |
160 |
3.09 |
1.22 |
|
Support form teacher |
196 |
2.64 |
1.13 |
196 |
3.71 |
1.01 |
|
Home support_______ |
207 |
2.49 |
1.17 |
208 |
3.08 |
1.18 |
|
Task easiness________ |
49 |
2.06 |
.97 |
49 |
2.86 |
1.15 |
|
ANOVA_________ |
F=4.986, p=. 000 |
F=14.' |
85, p=. |
000___ | ||
Table 7.2.8: Mean scores and Standard Deviation of 8th graders’ sense of security in learning
mathematics promoted by teaching methods according to their attribution styles of success in
mathematics learning______________________________________________
|
Reading a textbook |
Teacher explanation |
Individual work | |||||||
|
N...... |
M__ |
SD |
_N___ |
M |
SD |
N |
M__ |
SD | |
|
Ability |
58 |
2.88 |
1.35 |
58 |
3.21 |
1.39 |
58 |
4.03 |
1.20 |
|
Effort_____________________ |
409 |
3.02 |
1.24 |
409 |
3.71 |
1.11 |
409 |
3.95 |
1.17 |
|
Luck________________ |
160 |
2.56 |
1.17 |
160 |
3.18 |
1.23 |
160 |
3.49 |
1.28 |
|
Support form teacher |
194 |
2.99 |
1.17 |
194 |
3.91 |
.98 |
194 |
3.58 |
1.09 |
|
Home support_______ |
208 |
2.79 |
1.23 |
208 |
3.37 |
1.20 |
208 |
3.72 |
1.12 |
|
Task easiness________ |
49 |
2.63 |
1.33 |
49 |
3.29 |
1.41 |
49 |
3.82 |
1.30 |
|
ANOVA_________ |
F=4.2' |
7, p=. 001 |
F=11,278, p=. 000 |
F=5.484, p=. 000 | |||||
Table 7.2.9: Mean scores and Standard Deviation of 8th graders’ sense of progress in learning
mathematics promoted by teaching methods according to their attribution styles of success in
mathematics learning______________________________________________
|
Reading a textbook |
Teacherexplanation |
Individual work_______ | |||||||
|
N |
M |
SD |
N |
M__ |
SD |
_N___ |
M__ |
SD | |
|
Ability____________________ |
58 |
3.21 |
1.40 |
58 |
3.69 |
1.20 |
58 |
3.97 |
1.06 |
|
Effort_____________________ |
409 |
3.31 |
1.24 |
408 |
4.08 |
.97 |
409 |
4.10 |
1.02 |
|
Luck_______________ |
158 |
2.89 |
1.16 |
158 |
3.62 |
1.13 |
158 |
3.72 |
1.11 |
|
Support form teacher |
196 |
3.29 |
1.20 |
196 |
4.19 |
.89 |
196 |
3.78 |
1.09 |
|
Home support_______ |
209 |
3.13 |
1.12 |
209 |
3.74 |
1.06 |
209 |
3.89 |
1.06 |
|
Task easiness________ |
49 |
2.76 |
1.25 |
49 |
3.86 |
1.06 |
49 |
3.94 |
1.13 |
|
ANOVA_________ |
F=4.461,p=. 000 |
F=9.459, p=. 000 |
F=4.2Z |
12, p=. 001 | |||||
More intriguing information
1. Imputing Dairy Producers' Quota Discount Rate Using the Individual Export Milk Program in Quebec2. The name is absent
3. Brauchen wir ein Konjunkturprogramm?: Kommentar
4. Business Networks and Performance: A Spatial Approach
5. The name is absent
6. Biological Control of Giant Reed (Arundo donax): Economic Aspects
7. Climate Policy under Sustainable Discounted Utilitarianism
8. The name is absent
9. Kharaj and land proprietary right in the sixteenth century: An example of law and economics
10. The Structure Performance Hypothesis and The Efficient Structure Performance Hypothesis-Revisited: The Case of Agribusiness Commodity and Food Products Truck Carriers in the South