Table 7.2.4: Mean scores and Standard Deviation of 5th graders’ sense of progress in learning
mathematics promoted by teaching methods according to their attribution styles of success in
mathematics learning_______________________________________________________________
|
Practical work |
Teacher explanation |
Individual work |
Whole-class discussioι | |||||||||
|
_N___ |
M__ |
SD |
_N___ |
M__ |
SD |
N |
M__ |
SD |
_N___ |
M__ |
SD | |
|
Ability _______________ |
32 |
3.56 |
1.46 |
32 |
3.53 |
1.41 |
32 |
3.94 |
1.24 |
32 |
3.41 |
1.39 |
|
Effort_____________________ |
363 |
3.62 |
1.20 |
364 |
3.91 |
1.07 |
364 |
3.68 |
1.20 |
364 |
3.60 |
1.14 |
|
Luck______________ |
93 |
3.19 |
1.26 |
93 |
3.35 |
1.21 |
93 |
3.33 |
1.30 |
93 |
3.17 |
1.30 |
|
Support form teacher |
269 |
3.59 |
1.24 |
269 |
4.28 |
.85 |
269 |
3.38 |
1.26 |
269 |
3.58 |
1.21 |
|
Home support_______ |
378 |
3.35 |
1.31 |
379 |
3.90 |
1.14 |
379 |
3.65 |
1.31 |
379 |
3.34 |
1.24 |
|
Task easiness_______ |
36 |
3.67 |
1.33 |
36 |
3.64 |
1.38 |
36 |
3.67 |
1.39 |
36 |
3.19 |
1.41 |
|
ANOVA_________ |
F=3,175, p=. 007 |
F=12.∙ |
80, p=. |
000___ |
F=3.335, p=. 005 |
F=3.603, p=. 003 | ||||||
Table 7.2.5: Mean and Standard deviation of 5th graders’ perceptions of frequency of
deployment of teaching methods according to their attribution styles of success in mathematics
learning___________________________________________________________________________________
|
Practical work________ |
Individual work__ |
Indivic |
ual help________ |
Group discussion | ||||||||
|
N |
M |
SD |
N |
M |
SD |
N |
M |
SD |
N___ |
M__ |
SD | |
|
Ability____________________ |
31 |
2.23 |
.99 |
31 |
3.90 |
1.11 |
31 |
2.23 |
.96 |
30 |
2.33 |
.99 |
|
Effort_____________________ |
364 |
2.45 |
.87 |
360 |
3.66 |
.92 |
364 |
2.88 |
1.01 |
362 |
2.51 |
.89 |
|
Luck________________ |
93 |
2.40 |
.86 |
93 |
3.31 |
.97 |
92 |
2.64 |
1.01 |
93 |
2.38 |
.91 |
|
Supportformteacher |
268 |
2.60 |
1.00 |
267 |
3.47 |
.93 |
268 |
3.02 |
.89 |
267 |
2.58 |
1.01 |
|
Home support_______ |
381 |
2.42 |
.86 |
378 |
3.66 |
.89 |
380 |
2.74 |
1.02 |
378 |
2.39 |
.90 |
|
Task easiness________ |
36 |
1.83 |
.94 |
36 |
3.81 |
.98 |
36 |
2.42 |
1.18 |
36 |
2.03 |
,77 |
|
ANOVA_________ |
F=5.390, p=. 000 |
F=4.486, p=. 000 |
F=6.983, p=. 000 |
F=3.454, p=. 004 | ||||||||
8th graders perceiving themselves successful in mathematics learning
Table 7.2.6: Mean scores and Standard Deviation of 8th graders’ enjoyment promoted by
teaching methods according to their attribution styles of success in mathematics learning
|
Reading a textbook |
Teacher explanation | |||||
|
N |
M |
SD |
N |
M__ |
SD | |
|
Ability____________________ |
58 |
2.41 |
1.31 |
58 |
2.86 |
1.33 |
|
Effort____________________ |
412 |
2.74 |
1.19 |
412 |
3.58 |
1.15 |
|
Luck________________ |
159 |
2.41 |
1.08 |
160 |
3.23 |
1.25 |
|
Support form teacher |
196 |
2.66 |
1.11 |
196 |
3.86 |
1.07 |
|
Home support_______ |
209 |
2.66 |
1.17 |
209 |
3.28 |
1.17 |
|
Task easiness________ |
49 |
2.37 |
1.25 |
49 |
3.22 |
1.34 |
|
ANOVA_________ |
F=2.6z |
15, p<. 01 |
F=6.522, p<. 01 | |||
More intriguing information
1. The duration of fixed exchange rate regimes2. AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE PRODUCTION EFFECTS OF ADOPTING GM SEED TECHNOLOGY: THE CASE OF FARMERS IN ARGENTINA
3. CAN CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS PREDICT FINANCIAL CRISES? EMPIRICAL STUDY ON EMERGING MARKETS
4. The Impact of Cognitive versus Affective Aspects on Consumer Usage of Financial Service Delivery Channels
5. El Mercosur y la integración económica global
6. Trade Openness and Volatility
7. The Economic Value of Basin Protection to Improve the Quality and Reliability of Potable Water Supply: Some Evidence from Ecuador
8. For Whom is MAI? A theoretical Perspective on Multilateral Agreements on Investments
9. The name is absent
10. Flatliners: Ideology and Rational Learning in the Diffusion of the Flat Tax