Table 7.2.4: Mean scores and Standard Deviation of 5th graders’ sense of progress in learning
mathematics promoted by teaching methods according to their attribution styles of success in
mathematics learning_______________________________________________________________
Practical work |
Teacher explanation |
Individual work |
Whole-class discussioι | |||||||||
_N___ |
M__ |
SD |
_N___ |
M__ |
SD |
N |
M__ |
SD |
_N___ |
M__ |
SD | |
Ability _______________ |
32 |
3.56 |
1.46 |
32 |
3.53 |
1.41 |
32 |
3.94 |
1.24 |
32 |
3.41 |
1.39 |
Effort_____________________ |
363 |
3.62 |
1.20 |
364 |
3.91 |
1.07 |
364 |
3.68 |
1.20 |
364 |
3.60 |
1.14 |
Luck______________ |
93 |
3.19 |
1.26 |
93 |
3.35 |
1.21 |
93 |
3.33 |
1.30 |
93 |
3.17 |
1.30 |
Support form teacher |
269 |
3.59 |
1.24 |
269 |
4.28 |
.85 |
269 |
3.38 |
1.26 |
269 |
3.58 |
1.21 |
Home support_______ |
378 |
3.35 |
1.31 |
379 |
3.90 |
1.14 |
379 |
3.65 |
1.31 |
379 |
3.34 |
1.24 |
Task easiness_______ |
36 |
3.67 |
1.33 |
36 |
3.64 |
1.38 |
36 |
3.67 |
1.39 |
36 |
3.19 |
1.41 |
ANOVA_________ |
F=3,175, p=. 007 |
F=12.∙ |
80, p=. |
000___ |
F=3.335, p=. 005 |
F=3.603, p=. 003 |
Table 7.2.5: Mean and Standard deviation of 5th graders’ perceptions of frequency of
deployment of teaching methods according to their attribution styles of success in mathematics
learning___________________________________________________________________________________
Practical work________ |
Individual work__ |
Indivic |
ual help________ |
Group discussion | ||||||||
N |
M |
SD |
N |
M |
SD |
N |
M |
SD |
N___ |
M__ |
SD | |
Ability____________________ |
31 |
2.23 |
.99 |
31 |
3.90 |
1.11 |
31 |
2.23 |
.96 |
30 |
2.33 |
.99 |
Effort_____________________ |
364 |
2.45 |
.87 |
360 |
3.66 |
.92 |
364 |
2.88 |
1.01 |
362 |
2.51 |
.89 |
Luck________________ |
93 |
2.40 |
.86 |
93 |
3.31 |
.97 |
92 |
2.64 |
1.01 |
93 |
2.38 |
.91 |
Supportformteacher |
268 |
2.60 |
1.00 |
267 |
3.47 |
.93 |
268 |
3.02 |
.89 |
267 |
2.58 |
1.01 |
Home support_______ |
381 |
2.42 |
.86 |
378 |
3.66 |
.89 |
380 |
2.74 |
1.02 |
378 |
2.39 |
.90 |
Task easiness________ |
36 |
1.83 |
.94 |
36 |
3.81 |
.98 |
36 |
2.42 |
1.18 |
36 |
2.03 |
,77 |
ANOVA_________ |
F=5.390, p=. 000 |
F=4.486, p=. 000 |
F=6.983, p=. 000 |
F=3.454, p=. 004 |
8th graders perceiving themselves successful in mathematics learning
Table 7.2.6: Mean scores and Standard Deviation of 8th graders’ enjoyment promoted by
teaching methods according to their attribution styles of success in mathematics learning
Reading a textbook |
Teacher explanation | |||||
N |
M |
SD |
N |
M__ |
SD | |
Ability____________________ |
58 |
2.41 |
1.31 |
58 |
2.86 |
1.33 |
Effort____________________ |
412 |
2.74 |
1.19 |
412 |
3.58 |
1.15 |
Luck________________ |
159 |
2.41 |
1.08 |
160 |
3.23 |
1.25 |
Support form teacher |
196 |
2.66 |
1.11 |
196 |
3.86 |
1.07 |
Home support_______ |
209 |
2.66 |
1.17 |
209 |
3.28 |
1.17 |
Task easiness________ |
49 |
2.37 |
1.25 |
49 |
3.22 |
1.34 |
ANOVA_________ |
F=2.6z |
15, p<. 01 |
F=6.522, p<. 01 |
More intriguing information
1. Monetary Policy News and Exchange Rate Responses: Do Only Surprises Matter?2. Emissions Trading, Electricity Industry Restructuring and Investment in Pollution Abatement
3. The name is absent
4. Return Predictability and Stock Market Crashes in a Simple Rational Expectations Model
5. Conflict and Uncertainty: A Dynamic Approach
6. Flatliners: Ideology and Rational Learning in the Diffusion of the Flat Tax
7. The name is absent
8. Imperfect competition and congestion in the City
9. The name is absent
10. Testing Panel Data Regression Models with Spatial Error Correlation