Table 7.2.10: Mean scores and Standard Deviation of 8th graders’ perceptions of frequency of
deployment of teaching methods according to their attribution styles of success in mathematics
learning _______________________________________________________________________
Teacher explanation |
Individual work |
Individual help |
Whole-class |
Group | |||||||||||
N |
M |
SD |
_N___ |
M__ |
SD |
_N___ |
M__ |
SD |
_N___ |
M__ |
SD |
N___ |
M__ |
SD | |
1 |
57 |
4.04 |
1.02 |
57 |
3.88 |
.96 |
57 |
3.18 |
1.30 |
57 |
1.82 |
1.04 |
57 |
1.35 |
.52 |
2 |
409 |
4.22 |
.84 |
409 |
4.05 |
.79 |
408 |
3.33 |
1.04 |
406 |
1.85 |
.88 |
409 |
1.54 |
.80 |
3 |
157 |
3.81 |
1.06 |
159 |
3.76 |
1.02 |
158 |
2.92 |
1.11 |
158 |
1.79 |
.90 |
157 |
1.46 |
.72 |
4 |
192 |
4.17 |
.87 |
193 |
3.84 |
.84 |
196 |
3.32 |
1.06 |
193 |
2.13 |
1.01 |
192 |
1.71 |
.93 |
5 |
207 |
4.06 |
.96 |
208 |
3.94 |
.82 |
208 |
3.09 |
1.06 |
206 |
1.97 |
.95 |
206 |
1.50 |
.69 |
6 |
49 |
4.27 |
1.00 |
49 |
3.86 |
∣1.12 |
48 |
2.90 |
1.19 |
49 |
1.61 |
1.04 |
49 |
1.37 |
.67 |
F=5.151, P=OOO |
F=3.236, p=.007 |
F=5.089, p=.000 |
F=4,225, p=.001 |
F=3.365, p=.005 |
I=AbiIity, 2=Effort, 3=Luck, 4=Support from teacher, 5=Home support, 6=Task easiness
5th graders perceiving themselves failing in mathematics learning
Table 7.2.1 T. Mean scores and Standard Deviation of 5th graders’ perceived deployment
of Teacher explanation and their affective attitudes towards mathematics learning
promoted by this teaching method according to their attribution styles of failure in
mathematics earning___________________________________________________________
Teacher |
Enjoyment_______ |
Motivation________ |
Sense of security |
Sense of progress |
Deployment | ||||||||||
J_ |
M__ |
SD |
_N__ |
M |
SD |
_N__ |
M |
SD |
N |
M |
SD |
N |
M |
SD | |
Lack of ability |
88 |
2.93 |
1.28 |
88 |
2.77 |
1.32 |
88 |
2.75 |
1.38 |
88 |
3.08 |
1.44 |
87 |
2.93 |
1.19 |
Lack of effort |
97 |
3.53 |
1.25 |
97 |
3.08 |
1.33 |
97 |
3.23 |
1.34 |
97 |
3.45 |
1.38 |
97 |
3.19 |
1.25 |
Lack of luck |
9 |
3.33 |
1.80 |
9 |
3.11 |
1.76 |
9 |
3.67 |
1.66 |
9 |
4.11 |
1.36 |
9 |
4.11 |
.93 |
Lack of support |
7 |
1.43 |
1.13 |
7 |
1.14 |
.38 |
7 |
1.29 |
.76 |
7 |
1.29 |
.76 |
7 |
2.14 |
1.07 |
Lack of home sup∣ |
10 |
2.50 |
1.51 |
10 |
2.50 |
1.18 |
10 |
2.30 |
1.42 |
10 |
2.80 |
1.32 |
10 |
3.40 |
1.27 |
Task difficulty |
34 |
3.38 |
1.28 |
34 |
3.38 |
1.44 |
34 |
3.26 |
1.38 |
34 |
3.68 |
1.41 |
34 |
3.00 |
1.02 |
ANOVA______ |
F= 5.317, p<. 01 |
F=4.016, p<. 01 |
F=4.535, p<. 01 |
F=4.984, p<. 01 |
F=2.842, p<. 05 |
8th graders perceiving themselves failing in mathematics learning
Table 7.2.12: Mean scores and Standard Deviation of 8th graders’ affective attitudes promoted
by Teacher explanation and Group discussion according to their attribution styles of failure in
mathematics earning__________________________________________________________
Teacher |
Enjoyment |
Motivation |
Sense of security |
Sense of progress |
Deployment | ||||||||||
N |
M |
SD |
_N__ |
M__ |
SD |
N |
M |
SD |
N |
M |
SD |
N |
M__ |
SD | |
Lack of ability |
88 |
3.22 |
1.32 |
87 |
2.71 |
1.37 |
87 |
3.05 |
1.39 |
87 |
3.60 |
1.26 |
87 |
3.85 |
1.17 |
Lack of effort |
487 |
3.35 |
1.22 |
485 |
3.22 |
1.21 |
482 |
3.41 |
1.20 |
482 |
3.82 |
1.06 |
485 |
3.93 |
1.05 |
Lack of luck |
16 |
3.50 |
1.21 |
16 |
3.56 |
1.26 |
16 |
3.44 |
1.03 |
16 |
4.00 |
1.16 |
16 |
3.69 |
1.20 |
Lack of support fo |
55 |
2.65 |
1.42 |
54 |
2.48 |
1.30 |
55 |
2.93 |
1.41 |
55 |
3.07 |
1.29 |
55 |
3.73 |
1.06 |
Lack of home sup |
~24^ |
3.38 |
1.31 |
24 |
^^3∕Γ7^ |
1.37 |
~24~ |
3.38 |
1.31 |
24 |
3.71 |
1.08 |
24 |
3.96 |
.96 |
Task difficulty |
58 |
3.21 |
1.28 |
58 |
3.28 |
1.25 |
58 |
3.36 |
1.29 |
58 |
3.93 |
1.01 |
58 |
3.64 |
1.12 |
ANOVA |
F=1.512, p<1.0 |
F=2.293, p<. 01 |
F=1.257, p<1.0 |
F=2√ |
170, p<. 01 |
F=1.277, p<.5 |
More intriguing information
1. AGRICULTURAL PRODUCERS' WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR REAL-TIME MESOSCALE WEATHER INFORMATION2. Structural Conservation Practices in U.S. Corn Production: Evidence on Environmental Stewardship by Program Participants and Non-Participants
3. Conditions for learning: partnerships for engaging secondary pupils with contemporary art.
4. Road pricing and (re)location decisions households
5. The name is absent
6. Effects of a Sport Education Intervention on Students’ Motivational Responses in Physical Education
7. The name is absent
8. Does Competition Increase Economic Efficiency in Swedish County Councils?
9. The Impact of Cognitive versus Affective Aspects on Consumer Usage of Financial Service Delivery Channels
10. Testing Panel Data Regression Models with Spatial Error Correlation