7.2: the relationships between pupils’ attribution styles and their perceived
frequency of the teaching methods and affective attitudes promoted by the
teaching methods
5th graders perceiving themselves successful in mathematics learning
Table 7.2.1: Mean scores and Standard Deviation of 5th graders’ enjoyment promoted by
teaching methods according to their attribution styles of success in mathematics learning
|
Reading a textbook_________ |
Teacher explanation |
Individua |
work | ||||||
|
_N_____ |
M____ |
SD |
N_____ |
M____ |
SD |
_N_____ |
M____ |
SD | |
|
Ability_______________________ |
32 |
2.88 |
1.24 |
32 |
2.72 |
1.44 |
32 |
3.50 |
1.55 |
|
Effort_______________________ |
364 |
3.05 |
1.14 |
363 |
3.49 |
1.17 |
364 |
3.01 |
1.20 |
|
Luck_________________ |
93 |
2.61 |
1.16 |
93 |
2.98 |
1.15 |
93 |
2.59 |
1.17 |
|
Support form teacher |
270 |
2.76 |
1.14 |
270 |
3.75 |
1.08 |
270 |
2.84 |
1.24 |
|
Home support_________ |
379 |
2.90 |
1.14 |
381 |
3.47 |
1.19 |
381 |
3.11 |
hL37 |
|
Task easiness__________ |
36 |
2.53 |
1.28 |
36 |
3.11 |
1.30 |
36 |
3.42 |
1.52 |
|
ANOVA___________ |
F=3.811, |
p=. 002 |
F=9.799, |
p=. 000 |
F=5.041, |
p=. 000 | |||
Table 7.2.2: Mean scores and Standard Deviation of 5th graders’ motivation to learn
mathematics promoted by teaching methods according to their attribution styles of success in
mathematics learning_____________________________________________________________
|
Reading a textbook |
Teacherexplanation |
Individual work__ |
Whole-class discussioι | |||||||||
|
_N___ |
M___ |
SD |
_N___ |
M___ |
SD |
_N___ |
M___ |
SD |
N___ |
M__ |
SD | |
|
Ability____________________ |
32 |
2.66 |
1.29 |
32 |
2.72 |
1.33 |
32 |
3.78 |
1.36 |
32 |
2.78 |
1.36 |
|
Effort____________________ |
363 |
3.03 |
1.22 |
364 |
3.40 |
1.18 |
364 |
3.22 |
1.31 |
364 |
3.35 |
1.14 |
|
Luck________________ |
93 |
2.58 |
1.18 |
93 |
2.53 |
1.14 |
93 |
2.83 |
1.32 |
93 |
2.96 |
1.24 |
|
Support form teacher |
270 |
2.63 |
1.21 |
270 |
3.79 |
1.11 |
270 |
2.94 |
1.37 |
270 |
3.37 |
1.20 |
|
Home support_______ |
380 |
2.83 |
1.28 |
381 |
3.38 |
1.21 |
381 |
3.21 |
1.42 |
381 ∣ |
3.18 |
1.21 |
|
Task easiness________ |
36 |
2.53 |
1.38 |
36 |
3.00 |
1.33 |
36 |
3.47 |
1.46 |
36 ^ |
2.94 |
1.37 |
|
ANOVA_________ |
F=4.523, p=. 000 |
F=18.896, p=. 000 |
F=4.398, p=. 001 |
F=3.807, p=. 002 | ||||||||
Table 7.2.3: Mean scores and Standard Deviation of 5th graders’ sense of security in learning
mathematics promoted by teaching methods according to their attribution styles of success in
mathematics learning____________________________________________________________
|
Practical work |
Teacher |
Individual work |
Individual help |
Group discussion | |||||||||||
|
_N___ |
M__ |
SD |
N___ |
M__ |
SD |
_N___ |
M__ |
SD |
_N___ |
M__ |
SD |
N |
и......... |
SD | |
|
1 |
32 |
3.63 |
1.34 |
32 |
2.81 |
1.28 |
32 |
4.00 |
1.37 |
32 |
3.22 |
1.39 |
32 |
3.03 |
1.28 |
|
2 |
361 |
3.43 |
1.19 |
362 |
3.47 |
1.17 |
362 |
3.42 |
1.30 |
362 |
2.95 |
1.30 |
362 |
3.36 |
1.15 |
|
3 |
93 |
2.78 |
1.24 |
93 |
2.68 |
1.27 |
93 |
2.89 |
1.36 |
93 |
2.33 |
1.22 |
93 |
2.86 |
1.24 |
|
4 |
270 |
3.31 |
1.19 |
270 |
3.81 |
1.07 |
270 |
3.01 |
1.30 |
270 |
2.77 |
1.26 |
270 |
3.31 |
1.19 |
|
5 |
379 |
3.24 |
1.31 |
379 |
3.44 |
1.24 |
379 |
3.44 |
1.33 |
379 |
2.87 |
1.41 |
379 |
3.18 |
1.19 |
|
6 |
36 |
3.61 |
1.38 |
36 |
3.14 j |
1.42 |
36 |
3.75 |
1.34 |
35 |
2,97 |
1.52 |
36 |
2.97 |
1.28 |
|
F=5.0 |
4, p=. 000 |
F=15, |
53, p=. 000 |
F=8.332, p=. 000 |
F=3.985, p=. 001 |
F=3.638, p=. 003 | |||||||||
I=AbiIity, 2=Effort, 3=Luck, 4=Support from teacher, 5=Home support, 6=Task easiness
More intriguing information
1. Has Competition in the Japanese Banking Sector Improved?2. MULTIPLE COMPARISONS WITH THE BEST: BAYESIAN PRECISION MEASURES OF EFFICIENCY RANKINGS
3. The name is absent
4. Herman Melville and the Problem of Evil
5. Can a Robot Hear Music? Can a Robot Dance? Can a Robot Tell What it Knows or Intends to Do? Can it Feel Pride or Shame in Company?
6. The name is absent
7. Recognizability of Individual Creative Style Within and Across Domains: Preliminary Studies
8. Sustainability of economic development and governance patterns in water management - an overview on the reorganisation of public utilities in Campania, Italy, under EU Framework Directive in the field of water policy (2000/60/CE)
9. Does adult education at upper secondary level influence annual wage earnings?
10. Education and Development: The Issues and the Evidence