5th and 8th grade pupils’ and teachers’ perceptions of the relationships between teaching methods, classroom ethos, and positive affective attitudes towards learning mathematics in Japan



Table 7.3.2: Mean of frequency of deployment of teaching methods and affective attitude
promoted by teaching methods between pupils with higher and lower levels of satisfaction at 8th
grade ________________________________________________________________________

satisfaction

Enjoyment____________

Motivation

Sense of security

Sense of progress

Deployment

N____

IVI_________

SD

N____

M___

SD

N____

M___

SD

N____

M___

SD

N____

M___

SD

PW

H__

1138

2.82

1.35

1135

2.73

1.30

1131

2.60

1.23

1131

2.82

1.27

1129

1.48

.62

_L__

843

2.83

1.37

841

2.58

1.26

840

2.44

1.15

839

2.65

1.22

840

1.34

.58

t=-.184, df=1979, p>.05

t= 2.468, df=1974l

p<.05__________________

t= 3.022, df=1969,
p<.01__

t= 3.058, df=1968,
p<.01 ________

t= 5.146, df=1870.210,
p<.01   _______

UC

H

1137

2.97

1.50

1133

2.83

1.36

1129

2.57

1.26

1129

2.52

1.19

1131

1.42

.73

_L__

843

3.21

1.53

841

3.00

1.44

839

2.68

1.31

837

2.67

1.26

839

1.27

.60

t=3.471, df=1791.387,

p<.01           _______

t=-2.633, df=1972, p<.0

t= 1.924, df=1966,
p>.05

t=-2.731, df=1964,
p<.01

t= 5.008, df=1944.876,
p<.01

RT

~H~~

1138

2.74

1.20

1131

2.59

1.20

1132

2.92

1.24

1131

3.32

1.24

1129

3.11

1.12

_L__

842

2.43

1.15

838

2.27

1.12

839

2.62

1.23

837

2.94

1.24

833

2.93

1.19

t= 5.870, df=1978, p<.01

t= 6.012, df=1863.504,
p<.01

t= 5.286, df=1808.626,
p<.01 ______

t= 6.791, df=1966,
p<.01

t=3.391, df=1960, p<.01

TE

H

1138

3.66

1.13

1135

3.48

1.16

1131

3.68

1.14

1131

4.03

1.00

1126

4.06

.98

_L__

843

3.01

1.27

840

2.81

1.20

840

3.13

1.27

838

3.58

1.16

836

3.97

1.03

t= 12.058, df=1979,
p<.01__________________

t= 12.540, df=1973,
p<.01__________________

t= 9.882, df=1695.996, p∙

t= 8.884, df=1642.743,
p<.01__________________

t= 1.831, df=1960,
p>.05__________________

IW

H

1138

3.42

1.22

1135

3.51

1.26

1131

3.72

1.22

1131

3.93

1.11

1126

3.86

.87

J.__

843

2.99

1.28

840

3.13

1.27

840

3.42

1.31

839

3.63

1.20

836

3.83

.93

t= 7.465, df=1979,
p<.01__

t= 6.525, df=1973,
p<.01__

t= 5.254, df=1733.318,
p<.01__

t= 5.831, df=1728.853,

p<.01__________________

t=.785, df=1735.678, p>.

IH

H

1138

3.11

1.29

1135

3.39

1.33

1130

3.63

1.29

1131

4.11

1.10

1125

3.29

1.07

_L__

843

2.81

1.33

841

3.11

1.36

840

3.37

1.35

838

3.94

1.20

837

2.88

1.09

t=-5.057, df=1782.607,
_p<.01

t= 4.641, df=1974,
D<.01

t= 4.244, df=1968,

p<.01   ______

t= 3.224, df=1708.718,

p<.01__

t= 8.217, df=1960,
p<.01__________________

WD

H

1138

2.63

1.22

1135

2.58

1.19

1130

2.52

1.13

1131

2.63

1.15

1123

1.99

.99

_L__

843

2.42

1.19

841

2.32

1.17

840

2.27

1.14

839

2.37

1,14

833

1.69

.84

t=-3.758, df=1979,
p<.01

t= 4.823, df=1974,
p<.01

t= 4.802, df=1968, p<.01

t= 5.121, df=1968, p<.01

t= 7.160, df=1954, p<.01

GD

H

1138

2.77

1.28

1134

2.78

1.26

1130

2.66

1.20

1130

2.70

1.16

1121

1.62

.83

_L__

843

2.72

1.34

841

2.56

1.29

838

2.48

1.20

839

2.52

1.20

830

1.42

.69

t= .833, df=1770.113,

p>.05__________________

t= 3.757, df=1973,
p<.01_________________

t= 3.414, df=1966,
p<.01__________________

t= 3.486, df=1771.332,
p<.01__________________

t= 5.760, p=1916.946,
p<.01__________________



More intriguing information

1. BEN CHOI & YANBING CHEN
2. Transgression et Contestation Dans Ie conte diderotien. Pierre Hartmann Strasbourg
3. A Bayesian approach to analyze regional elasticities
4. The growing importance of risk in financial regulation
5. Uncertain Productivity Growth and the Choice between FDI and Export
6. Understanding the (relative) fall and rise of construction wages
7. The name is absent
8. Naïve Bayes vs. Decision Trees vs. Neural Networks in the Classification of Training Web Pages
9. Telecommuting and environmental policy - lessons from the Ecommute program
10. A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON UNDERINVESTMENT IN AGRICULTURAL R&D