Table 7.3.2: Mean of frequency of deployment of teaching methods and affective attitude
promoted by teaching methods between pupils with higher and lower levels of satisfaction at 8th
grade ________________________________________________________________________
satisfaction |
Enjoyment____________ |
Motivation |
Sense of security |
Sense of progress |
Deployment | |||||||||||
N____ |
IVI_________ |
SD |
N____ |
M___ |
SD |
N____ |
M___ |
SD |
N____ |
M___ |
SD |
N____ |
M___ |
SD | ||
PW |
H__ |
1138 |
2.82 |
1.35 |
1135 |
2.73 |
1.30 |
1131 |
2.60 |
1.23 |
1131 |
2.82 |
1.27 |
1129 |
1.48 |
.62 |
_L__ |
843 |
2.83 |
1.37 |
841 |
2.58 |
1.26 |
840 |
2.44 |
1.15 |
839 |
2.65 |
1.22 |
840 |
1.34 |
.58 | |
t=-.184, df=1979, p>.05 |
t= 2.468, df=1974l p<.05__________________ |
t= 3.022, df=1969, |
t= 3.058, df=1968, |
t= 5.146, df=1870.210, | ||||||||||||
UC |
H |
1137 |
2.97 |
1.50 |
1133 |
2.83 |
1.36 |
1129 |
2.57 |
1.26 |
1129 |
2.52 |
1.19 |
1131 |
1.42 |
.73 |
_L__ |
843 |
3.21 |
1.53 |
841 |
3.00 |
1.44 |
839 |
2.68 |
1.31 |
837 |
2.67 |
1.26 |
839 |
1.27 |
.60 | |
t=3.471, df=1791.387, p<.01 _______ |
t=-2.633, df=1972, p<.0 |
t= 1.924, df=1966, |
t=-2.731, df=1964, |
t= 5.008, df=1944.876, | ||||||||||||
RT |
~H~~ |
1138 |
2.74 |
1.20 |
1131 |
2.59 |
1.20 |
1132 |
2.92 |
1.24 |
1131 |
3.32 |
1.24 |
1129 |
3.11 |
1.12 |
_L__ |
842 |
2.43 |
1.15 |
838 |
2.27 |
1.12 |
839 |
2.62 |
1.23 |
837 |
2.94 |
1.24 |
833 |
2.93 |
1.19 | |
t= 5.870, df=1978, p<.01 |
t= 6.012, df=1863.504, |
t= 5.286, df=1808.626, |
t= 6.791, df=1966, |
t=3.391, df=1960, p<.01 | ||||||||||||
TE |
H |
1138 |
3.66 |
1.13 |
1135 |
3.48 |
1.16 |
1131 |
3.68 |
1.14 |
1131 |
4.03 |
1.00 |
1126 |
4.06 |
.98 |
_L__ |
843 |
3.01 |
1.27 |
840 |
2.81 |
1.20 |
840 |
3.13 |
1.27 |
838 |
3.58 |
1.16 |
836 |
3.97 |
1.03 | |
t= 12.058, df=1979, |
t= 12.540, df=1973, |
t= 9.882, df=1695.996, p∙ |
t= 8.884, df=1642.743, |
t= 1.831, df=1960, | ||||||||||||
IW |
H |
1138 |
3.42 |
1.22 |
1135 |
3.51 |
1.26 |
1131 |
3.72 |
1.22 |
1131 |
3.93 |
1.11 |
1126 |
3.86 |
.87 |
J.__ |
843 |
2.99 |
1.28 |
840 |
3.13 |
1.27 |
840 |
3.42 |
1.31 |
839 |
3.63 |
1.20 |
836 |
3.83 |
.93 | |
t= 7.465, df=1979, |
t= 6.525, df=1973, |
t= 5.254, df=1733.318, |
t= 5.831, df=1728.853, p<.01__________________ |
t=.785, df=1735.678, p>. | ||||||||||||
IH |
H |
1138 |
3.11 |
1.29 |
1135 |
3.39 |
1.33 |
1130 |
3.63 |
1.29 |
1131 |
4.11 |
1.10 |
1125 |
3.29 |
1.07 |
_L__ |
843 |
2.81 |
1.33 |
841 |
3.11 |
1.36 |
840 |
3.37 |
1.35 |
838 |
3.94 |
1.20 |
837 |
2.88 |
1.09 | |
t=-5.057, df=1782.607, |
t= 4.641, df=1974, |
t= 4.244, df=1968, p<.01 ______ |
t= 3.224, df=1708.718, p<.01__ |
t= 8.217, df=1960, | ||||||||||||
WD |
H |
1138 |
2.63 |
1.22 |
1135 |
2.58 |
1.19 |
1130 |
2.52 |
1.13 |
1131 |
2.63 |
1.15 |
1123 |
1.99 |
.99 |
_L__ |
843 |
2.42 |
1.19 |
841 |
2.32 |
1.17 |
840 |
2.27 |
1.14 |
839 |
2.37 |
1,14 |
833 |
1.69 |
.84 | |
t=-3.758, df=1979, |
t= 4.823, df=1974, |
t= 4.802, df=1968, p<.01 |
t= 5.121, df=1968, p<.01 |
t= 7.160, df=1954, p<.01 | ||||||||||||
GD |
H |
1138 |
2.77 |
1.28 |
1134 |
2.78 |
1.26 |
1130 |
2.66 |
1.20 |
1130 |
2.70 |
1.16 |
1121 |
1.62 |
.83 |
_L__ |
843 |
2.72 |
1.34 |
841 |
2.56 |
1.29 |
838 |
2.48 |
1.20 |
839 |
2.52 |
1.20 |
830 |
1.42 |
.69 | |
t= .833, df=1770.113, p>.05__________________ |
t= 3.757, df=1973, |
t= 3.414, df=1966, |
t= 3.486, df=1771.332, |
t= 5.760, p=1916.946, |
More intriguing information
1. TINKERING WITH VALUATION ESTIMATES: IS THERE A FUTURE FOR WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT MEASURES?2. Heavy Hero or Digital Dummy: multimodal player-avatar relations in FINAL FANTASY 7
3. The name is absent
4. PERFORMANCE PREMISES FOR HUMAN RESOURCES FROM PUBLIC HEALTH ORGANIZATIONS IN ROMANIA
5. Government spending composition, technical change and wage inequality
6. Automatic Dream Sentiment Analysis
7. Types of Tax Concessions for Promoting Investment in Free Economic and Trade Areas
8. The name is absent
9. Strategic Effects and Incentives in Multi-issue Bargaining Games
10. The Modified- Classroom ObservationScheduletoMeasureIntenticnaCommunication( M-COSMIC): EvaluationofReliabilityandValidity