5th and 8th grade pupils’ and teachers’ perceptions of the relationships between teaching methods, classroom ethos, and positive affective attitudes towards learning mathematics in Japan



Table 7.3.2: Mean of frequency of deployment of teaching methods and affective attitude
promoted by teaching methods between pupils with higher and lower levels of satisfaction at 8th
grade ________________________________________________________________________

satisfaction

Enjoyment____________

Motivation

Sense of security

Sense of progress

Deployment

N____

IVI_________

SD

N____

M___

SD

N____

M___

SD

N____

M___

SD

N____

M___

SD

PW

H__

1138

2.82

1.35

1135

2.73

1.30

1131

2.60

1.23

1131

2.82

1.27

1129

1.48

.62

_L__

843

2.83

1.37

841

2.58

1.26

840

2.44

1.15

839

2.65

1.22

840

1.34

.58

t=-.184, df=1979, p>.05

t= 2.468, df=1974l

p<.05__________________

t= 3.022, df=1969,
p<.01__

t= 3.058, df=1968,
p<.01 ________

t= 5.146, df=1870.210,
p<.01   _______

UC

H

1137

2.97

1.50

1133

2.83

1.36

1129

2.57

1.26

1129

2.52

1.19

1131

1.42

.73

_L__

843

3.21

1.53

841

3.00

1.44

839

2.68

1.31

837

2.67

1.26

839

1.27

.60

t=3.471, df=1791.387,

p<.01           _______

t=-2.633, df=1972, p<.0

t= 1.924, df=1966,
p>.05

t=-2.731, df=1964,
p<.01

t= 5.008, df=1944.876,
p<.01

RT

~H~~

1138

2.74

1.20

1131

2.59

1.20

1132

2.92

1.24

1131

3.32

1.24

1129

3.11

1.12

_L__

842

2.43

1.15

838

2.27

1.12

839

2.62

1.23

837

2.94

1.24

833

2.93

1.19

t= 5.870, df=1978, p<.01

t= 6.012, df=1863.504,
p<.01

t= 5.286, df=1808.626,
p<.01 ______

t= 6.791, df=1966,
p<.01

t=3.391, df=1960, p<.01

TE

H

1138

3.66

1.13

1135

3.48

1.16

1131

3.68

1.14

1131

4.03

1.00

1126

4.06

.98

_L__

843

3.01

1.27

840

2.81

1.20

840

3.13

1.27

838

3.58

1.16

836

3.97

1.03

t= 12.058, df=1979,
p<.01__________________

t= 12.540, df=1973,
p<.01__________________

t= 9.882, df=1695.996, p∙

t= 8.884, df=1642.743,
p<.01__________________

t= 1.831, df=1960,
p>.05__________________

IW

H

1138

3.42

1.22

1135

3.51

1.26

1131

3.72

1.22

1131

3.93

1.11

1126

3.86

.87

J.__

843

2.99

1.28

840

3.13

1.27

840

3.42

1.31

839

3.63

1.20

836

3.83

.93

t= 7.465, df=1979,
p<.01__

t= 6.525, df=1973,
p<.01__

t= 5.254, df=1733.318,
p<.01__

t= 5.831, df=1728.853,

p<.01__________________

t=.785, df=1735.678, p>.

IH

H

1138

3.11

1.29

1135

3.39

1.33

1130

3.63

1.29

1131

4.11

1.10

1125

3.29

1.07

_L__

843

2.81

1.33

841

3.11

1.36

840

3.37

1.35

838

3.94

1.20

837

2.88

1.09

t=-5.057, df=1782.607,
_p<.01

t= 4.641, df=1974,
D<.01

t= 4.244, df=1968,

p<.01   ______

t= 3.224, df=1708.718,

p<.01__

t= 8.217, df=1960,
p<.01__________________

WD

H

1138

2.63

1.22

1135

2.58

1.19

1130

2.52

1.13

1131

2.63

1.15

1123

1.99

.99

_L__

843

2.42

1.19

841

2.32

1.17

840

2.27

1.14

839

2.37

1,14

833

1.69

.84

t=-3.758, df=1979,
p<.01

t= 4.823, df=1974,
p<.01

t= 4.802, df=1968, p<.01

t= 5.121, df=1968, p<.01

t= 7.160, df=1954, p<.01

GD

H

1138

2.77

1.28

1134

2.78

1.26

1130

2.66

1.20

1130

2.70

1.16

1121

1.62

.83

_L__

843

2.72

1.34

841

2.56

1.29

838

2.48

1.20

839

2.52

1.20

830

1.42

.69

t= .833, df=1770.113,

p>.05__________________

t= 3.757, df=1973,
p<.01_________________

t= 3.414, df=1966,
p<.01__________________

t= 3.486, df=1771.332,
p<.01__________________

t= 5.760, p=1916.946,
p<.01__________________



More intriguing information

1. TINKERING WITH VALUATION ESTIMATES: IS THERE A FUTURE FOR WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT MEASURES?
2. Heavy Hero or Digital Dummy: multimodal player-avatar relations in FINAL FANTASY 7
3. The name is absent
4. PERFORMANCE PREMISES FOR HUMAN RESOURCES FROM PUBLIC HEALTH ORGANIZATIONS IN ROMANIA
5. Government spending composition, technical change and wage inequality
6. Automatic Dream Sentiment Analysis
7. Types of Tax Concessions for Promoting Investment in Free Economic and Trade Areas
8. The name is absent
9. Strategic Effects and Incentives in Multi-issue Bargaining Games
10. The Modified- Classroom ObservationScheduletoMeasureIntenticnaCommunication( M-COSMIC): EvaluationofReliabilityandValidity