Table 7.3.4: Mean of frequency of deployment of teaching methods and affective attitude
promoted by teaching methods between pupils with higher and lower levels of cohesiveness at
8th grade__________________________________________________________________________________
Enjoyment _______ |
Motivation ____ |
Sense Ofsecurity |
Sense of progress |
Deployment__ | ||||||||||||
N |
M___ |
SD |
N___ |
M___ |
SD |
N____ |
M___ |
SD |
N____ |
M___ |
SD |
N____ |
M___ |
SD | ||
PW |
H |
990 |
2.93 |
1.36 |
988 |
2.84 |
1.28 |
987 |
2.66 |
1.19 |
985 |
2.86 |
1.21 |
983 |
1.46 |
.62 |
L |
971 |
2.74 |
1.37 |
968 |
2.51 |
1.28 |
966 |
2.43 |
1.20 |
967 |
2.65 |
1.29 |
966 |
1.37 |
.58 | |
t=3.083, df=1959, |
t=5.671, df=1954, |
t=4.182, df=1951, p<.01 |
t=3.635, df=1936.861, p< |
t=3.524, df=1941.932, p<.01__ | ||||||||||||
UC |
H |
989 |
3.11 |
1.51 |
986 |
2.98 |
1.38 |
984 |
2.68 |
1.28 |
983 |
2.62 |
1.20 |
984 |
1.37 |
.68 |
Jz__ |
971 |
3.04 |
1.51 |
968 |
2.83 |
1.41 |
966 |
2.54 |
1.27 |
965 |
2.54 |
1.23 |
966 |
1.34 |
.68 | |
t=1.074, df=1958, p>.05 |
t=2.349, df=1952, p<.05 |
t=2.307, df=1948, |
t=1.482, df=1946, |
t=.918, df=1948, | ||||||||||||
RT |
^TΓ~ |
989 |
2.69 |
1.16 |
983 |
2.57 |
1.18 |
988 |
2.91 |
1.21 |
985 |
3.29 |
1.22 |
982 |
3.15 |
1.12 |
L |
971 |
2.53 |
1.20 |
966 |
2.34 |
1.16 |
965 |
2.69 |
1.27 |
965 |
3.04 |
1.27 |
960 |
2.92 |
1.17 | |
t=2.983, df=1958, p<.01 |
t=4.478, df=1947, p<.01 |
t=3.941, df=1941.558, p<.01 ______ |
t=4.331, df=1948, |
t=4.289, df=1940, p<.01 | ||||||||||||
TE |
H |
990 |
3.53 |
1.18 |
988 |
3.36 |
1.17 |
987 |
3.62 |
1.17 |
984 |
3.99 |
1.01 |
980 |
4.11 |
.93 |
Jz__ |
971 |
3.25 |
1.27 |
967 |
3.04 |
1.25 |
966 |
3.28 |
1.25 |
967 |
3.72 |
1.14 |
963 |
3.94 |
1.06 | |
t=5.077, df=1959, |
t=5.870, df=1953, p<.01 |
t=6.130, df=1951, p<.01 |
t=5.477, df=1912.829, p<.01__ |
t=3.811, df=1899.450, p< | ||||||||||||
IW |
~H~~ |
990 |
3.30 |
1.23 |
987 |
3.42 |
1.26 |
987 |
3.71 |
1.21 |
985 |
3.89 |
1.13 |
980 |
3.86 |
.88 |
Jz__ |
971 |
3.16 |
1.30 |
968 |
3.26 |
1.30 |
966 |
3.48 |
1.31 |
966 |
3.72 |
1.18 |
962 |
3.83 |
.92 | |
t=2.566, df=1959, p<.05 |
t=2.691, df=1953, p<.01 |
t=4.153, df=1933.090, p<.01__________________ |
t=3.332, df=1942.514, p< |
t=.626, df=1940, | ||||||||||||
IH |
~izΓ~ |
990 |
3.07 |
1.27 |
988 |
3.38 |
1.31 |
986 |
3.65 |
1.27 |
984 |
4.13 |
1.07 |
982 |
3.27 |
1.05 |
Jz__ |
971 |
2.90 |
1.34 |
968 |
3.17 |
1.39 |
966 |
3.40 |
1.36 |
967 |
3.96 |
1,20 |
959 |
2.97 |
1.11 | |
t=2.772, df=1950.528, p< |
t=3.363, df=1954, p<.01 |
t=4.097, df=1934.164, p<.01 ______ |
t=3.307, df=1918.763, p<.01__________________ |
t=5.935, df=1939, p<.01 | ||||||||||||
WD |
H |
990 |
2.71 |
1.23 |
988 |
2.67 |
1.20 |
986 |
2.57 |
1.15 |
985 |
2.65 |
1.14 |
978 |
1.97 |
.99 |
Jz__ |
971 |
2.38 |
1.17 |
968 |
2.27 |
1,14 |
966 |
2.25 |
1.11 |
967 |
2.40 |
1.16 |
958 |
1.77 |
.87 | |
t=6.075, df=1959, p<.01 |
t=7.536, df=1954, p<.01__ |
t=6.259, df=1950, p<.01 |
t=4.846, df=1947.125, p< |
t=4.517, df=1934, p<.01 | ||||||||||||
GD |
H |
990 |
2.90 |
1.29 |
987 |
2.89 |
1.27 |
985 |
2.76 |
1.19 |
985 |
2.74 |
1.15 |
974 |
1.59 |
.81 |
Jz___ |
971 |
2.59 |
1.30 |
968 |
2.48 |
1.24 |
965 |
2.41 |
1.18 |
966 |
2.51 |
1.20 |
957 |
1.48 |
.74 | |
t=5.195,df=1957.151, p<.01__________________ |
t=7.253, df=1953, p<.01 |
t=6.515, df=1948, |
t=4.450, df=1939.784, p<.01__________________ |
t=3.331,df=1918.195, p< |
More intriguing information
1. Washington Irving and the Knickerbocker Group2. Estimation of marginal abatement costs for undesirable outputs in India's power generation sector: An output distance function approach.
3. Factores de alteração da composição da Despesa Pública: o caso norte-americano
4. APPLICATIONS OF DUALITY THEORY TO AGRICULTURE
5. Manufacturing Earnings and Cycles: New Evidence
6. The Employment Impact of Differences in Dmand and Production
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Influence of Mucilage Viscosity On The Globule Structure And Stability Of Certain Starch Emulsions
10. Philosophical Perspectives on Trustworthiness and Open-mindedness as Professional Virtues for the Practice of Nursing: Implications for he Moral Education of Nurses