5th and 8th grade pupils’ and teachers’ perceptions of the relationships between teaching methods, classroom ethos, and positive affective attitudes towards learning mathematics in Japan



Table 7.3.7: Mean of frequency of deployment of teaching methods and affective attitude
promoted by teaching methods between pupils with higher and lower levels of friction at 5th
grade ______________________________________________________________________

Enjoyment____________

Motivation _________

Sense of security

Sense of progress

Deployment

N____

M

SD

N____

M___

SD

N____

M

SD

N____

M___

SD

N____

M___

SD

PW

H

668

3.24

1.32

668

3.20

1.34

666

3.10

1.34

666

3.33

1.33

666

2.37

.89

Jz__

723

3.35

1.35

723

3.34

1.34

719

3.27

1.27

720

3.44

1.30

722

2.46

.93

T=-1.617, df=1389,
p>.05_______

t=-1.946, df=1389,
d>.05

t=-2.518, df=1383,
p<.05

T=-1.497, df=1384,
p>.05

t=-1.695, df=1386,
p>.05

UC

H

668

3.40

1.58

668

3.40

1.52

666

3.17

1.50

665

3.21

1.42

664

1.49

.79

J___

722

3.22

1.54

721

3.26

1.48

719

3.00

1.42

717

3.00

1.32

722

1.61

.83

t= 2.071, df=1388, p<.05

t= 1.781, df=1387,
j)>.05

t= 2.232,
df=1360.947, p<.05

t= 2.904,
df=1348.735, p<.01

t=-2.696,
df=1382.105rp<.05

RT

H

665

2.75

1.16

666

2.70

1.29

663

2.92

1.37

664

3.31

1.40

664

3.33

.96

J-__

722

2.94

1.18

722

2.85

1.26

720

3.00

1.29

721

3.53

1.29

721

3.46

.97

t=-3.005, df=1385,
p<.01__

t=-2.203, df=1386,
p<.05________ ________

t=-1.098,
Df=1353.497, p>.05

t=-3.067,
df=1346.995, p<.01

t=-2.509, df=1383,
p<.05__________________

TE

H

667

3.26

1.25

668

3.17

1.32

666

3.29

1.32

666

3.73

1.27

662

3.57

1.05

Jz__

723

3.56

1.20

723

3.43

1.20

719

3.45

1.21

720

3.92

1.12

717

3.65

1,04

t=-4.583, df=1388,
p<.01          ________

t=-3.948,
df=1348.668, p<.01_____

t=-2.315,
df=1346.944, p<.05

t-2.958,
df=1331.515, p<.01

t=-1.402, df=1377,
p>.05__________________

IW

H

668

2.90

1.35

668

2.98

1.43

666

3.11

1.41

666

3.45

1.38

663

3.46

1.00

Jz___

723

2.92

1.30

723

3.07

1.37

720

3.24

1.36

722

3.49

1.28

717

3.49

1.01

t= - .340,
df=1368.444, p>.05_____

t=-1.214,
df=1368.479, p>.05

t=-1.850, df=1384,
p>.05__________________

T= - .559,
Df=1352.766, p>.05

t=-.566, df=1378, p>.05

IH

H

666

2.41

1.24

668

2.55

1.38

666

2.71

1.39

666

3.14

1.43

664

2.83

1.07

J-__

720

2.46

1.22

721

2.65

1.32

719

2.78

1.36

722

3.26

1.34

721

2.85

1.00

t=-.754, df=1384,
p>.05

t=-1.318, df=1387,
_p>.05 ____

t= - .949, df=1383, p>.05

T=-1.539,
Df=1357.619, p>.05

t= - .421, df=1383, p>.05

WD

H

668

3.06

1.21

668

2.99

1.26

666

2.95

1.25

666

3.14

1.27

657

3.23

1.08

J-___

723

3.24

1.19

723

3.24

1.23

720

3.24

1.24

722

3.50

1.26

716

3.30

1.10

t=-2.940, df=1389,
p<.01

t=-3.778, df=1389,
p<.01__

t= - 4.221, df=1384,
p<.01__________________

t=-5.215, df=1386,
p<.01__________________

t=-1.193, df=1371, p>.0!

GD

H

668

3.00

1.24

668

2.98

1.26

666

2.96

1.23

666

3.10

1.23

660

2.35

.95

J-___

723

3.23

1.20

723

3.21

1.20

720

3.22

1.20

720

3.33

1.22

717

2.47

.91

t=-3.587, df=1389,
p<.01__________________

t=-3.513, df=1389,
p<.01__________________

t=-3.983, df=1384,
p<.01__________________

t=-3.492, df=1384,
p<.01__________________

t=-2.329, df=1375, p<.0!



More intriguing information

1. Strategic Planning on the Local Level As a Factor of Rural Development in the Republic of Serbia
2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Optimal Taxation of Capital Income in Models with Endogenous Fertility
5. Demand Potential for Goat Meat in Southern States: Empirical Evidence from a Multi-State Goat Meat Consumer Survey
6. The name is absent
7. Optimal Tax Policy when Firms are Internationally Mobile
8. Palkkaneuvottelut ja työmarkkinat Pohjoismaissa ja Euroopassa
9. Endogenous Determination of FDI Growth and Economic Growth:The OECD Case
10. Modellgestützte Politikberatung im Naturschutz: Zur „optimalen“ Flächennutzung in der Agrarlandschaft des Biosphärenreservates „Mittlere Elbe“