5th and 8th grade pupils’ and teachers’ perceptions of the relationships between teaching methods, classroom ethos, and positive affective attitudes towards learning mathematics in Japan



Table 7.3.10: Mean of frequency of deployment of teaching methods and affective attitude
promoted by teaching methods between pupils with higher and lower levels of perceived
competitiveness at 8th grade_________________________________________________________

Enjoyment____________

Motivation

Sense of security

Sense of progress

Deployment

N____

M___

SD

N___

M___

SD

N____

M___

SD

N____

M___

SD

N____

M___

SD

PW

H__

896

2.86

1.41

895

2.71

1.34

896

2.56

1.21

894

2.81

1.27

894

1.43

.62

_L__

1082

2.80

1.33

1077

2.64

1.24

1072

2.52

1.20

1073

2.72

1.24

1072

1.40

.60

t= 1.031,
df=1862.934, p>.05

t=1.177,
df=1848.257, p>.05

t=.632, df=1966,
p>.05

t= 1.643, df=1965, p>.05

t= 1.057, df=1964,
p>.05

UC

H

896

3.04

1.53

894

2.88

1.41

895

2.57

1.29

892

2.57

1.24

895

1.41

.72

_L__

1081

3.10

1.50

1076

2.93

1.38

1070

2.65

1.27

1071

2.60

1.21

1072

1.31

.65

t=-.771,df=1975,
p>.05__________________

t=-.869,df=1968,
p>.05______________

t=-1.406, df=1963,
p>.05

t=-.672,df=1961,
p>.05

t=3.482,
df=1809.978, p<.01

RT

H

895

2.65

1.21

892

2.49

1.21

896

2.89

1.27

894

3.28

1.24

889

3.10

1.13

J.__

1082

2.58

1.17

1073

2.42

1.16

1072

2.71

1.22

1071

3.06

1.26

1070

2.98

1.16

t=1.202, df=1975,
p>.05__________________

t=1.211, df=1963,
p>.05___

t=3.104, df=1966,
p<.01

t= 3.969, df=1963,
p<.O1

t=2.363, df=1957,
p<.05

TE

H

896

3.46

1.25

895

3.29

1.24

896

3.58

1.19

894

3.93

1.10

889

4.08

.97

_L__

1082

3.32

1.23

1076

3.13

1.21

1072

3.33

1.24

1072

3.77

1.08

1070

3.99

1.03

t=2.365, df=1976,
p<.05__________________

t=2.877,
df=1886.556, p<.01

t=4.510, df=1966,
p<.01

t=3.208, df=1964, p<.01

t= 1.950, df=1957,
p>.05

IW

ɪz

896

3.31

1.28

894

3.44

1.28

896

3.69

1.26

894

3.87

1.14

887

3.89

.90

JL__

1082

3.18

1.25

1077

3.27

1.28

1072

3.53

1.26

1073

3.75

1.17

1072

3.82

.89

t=2.178, df=1976,
p<.05 ____

t=2.896, df=1969,
p<.01

t=2.736, df=1966,
p<.01

t=2.251, df=1965,
p<.05

t= 1.516, df=1957,
p>.05

IH

~H

896

3.05

1.32

895

3.38

1.37

896

3.67

1.29

893

4.12

1.11

890

3.21

1.08

"l

1082

2.92

1.31

1077

3.18

1.33

1071

3.40

1.34

1073

3.97

1.18

1068

3.05

1.10

t=2.261, df=1976,

p<.05__________________

t=3.142,
df=1884.085, p<,01

t=4.495,
df=1928,259, p<.01

t=2.905, df=1964,
p<.01__________________

t=3.209, df=1956,
p<.01__________________

WD

H

896

2.60

1.25

895

2.52

1.23

895

2.46

1.15

894

2.55

1.18

885

1.93

.97

L___

1082

2.50

1.18

1077

2.43

1.15

1072

2.38

1.13

1073

2.51

1.13

1069

1.82

.91

t= 1.755,
df=1863.432, p>.05

t=1.720,
df=1848.127, p>.05

t=1.523, df=1965,
p>.05__________________

t=.930, df=1965,
p>.05__________________

t= 2.545, df=1952,
p<.05__________________

GD

H

896

2.73

1.30

894

2.69

1.29

893

2.60

1.21

894

2.64

1.19

880

1.56

.77

L___

1082

2.75

1.31

1077

2.67

1.26

1072

2.57

1.19

1072

2.62

1.17

1068

1.51

.77

t=-.338, df=1976,
p>.05__________________

t=.353, df=1969,
p>.05__________________

t=.597, df=1963,
p>.05__________________

t= .228, df=1964,
p>.05__________________

t= 1.595, df=1946,
p>.05__________________



More intriguing information

1. Incorporating global skills within UK higher education of engineers
2. Strategic Policy Options to Improve Irrigation Water Allocation Efficiency: Analysis on Egypt and Morocco
3. TRADE NEGOTIATIONS AND THE FUTURE OF AMERICAN AGRICULTURE
4. The Impact of Individual Investment Behavior for Retirement Welfare: Evidence from the United States and Germany
5. ‘I’m so much more myself now, coming back to work’ - working class mothers, paid work and childcare.
6. The name is absent
7. Business Networks and Performance: A Spatial Approach
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Demand Potential for Goat Meat in Southern States: Empirical Evidence from a Multi-State Goat Meat Consumer Survey