5th and 8th grade pupils’ and teachers’ perceptions of the relationships between teaching methods, classroom ethos, and positive affective attitudes towards learning mathematics in Japan



Table 7.4.2: Mean of frequency of deployment of teaching methods and affective attitude
promoted by teaching methods between pupils perceiving their teachers praising them because
of better achievement than others with lower frequency and higher frequency at 8th grade

Enjoyment____________

Motivation____________

Senseofsecurity

Senseofprogress

Deployment

N____

M___

SD

N___

M___

SD

N____

M___

SD

N____

M___

SD

N____

M___

SD

PW

H

1079

2.82

1.33

1077

2.78

1.27

1075

2.62

1.17

1075

2.82

1.21

1072

1.49

.63

_L__

1008

2.80

1.40

1004

2.53

1.30

1000

2.42

1.23

1004

2.67

1.30

1002

1.34

.57

t=.343,
df=2056.821, p>.05

t=4.375,
df=2061.819j)<.01

t=3.692,
df=2043.937, p<.01

t=2.831,
df=2038.635, p<.01

t=5.583,
df=2069.740, p<.01

UC

H

1078

3.12

1.52

1075

3.02

1.37

1073

2.70

1.27

1073

2.66

1.21

1072

1.39

.70

_L__

1008

2.97

1.52

1004

2.77

1.42

999

2.50

1.29

1001

2.47

1.22

,1004

1.30

.64

t=2.114, df=2084,
p<.05__________________

t=4.111,
df=2055.679, p<.01___

t=3.657, df=2070,
p<.01

t=3.569, df=2072,
p<.01

t=2.902,
df=2073.402, p<.01_____

RT

^TΓ~

1078

2.69

1.19

1074

2.58

1.17

1075

2.90

1.21

1073

3.24

1.22

1068

3.08

1.11

_L__

1007

2.52

1.18

1000

2.30

1.16

1000

2.66

1.26

1004

3.05

1.29

998

2.98

1.20

t=3.289, df=2083,
p<.01__________________

t=5.440, df=2072,
p<.01__________________

t=4.471,
df=2045.328, p<.01

t=3.478, df=2075,
p<.01__________________

t=2.111,
df=2021,353, p<.05

TE

H

1079

3.57

1.17

1077

3.40

1.16

1075

3.63

1.15

1075

3.99

1.00

1066

4.10

.95

_L__

1008

3.14

1.28

1003

2.96

1.25

1000

3.22

1.27

1003

3.64

1.18

1000

3.90

1,07

t=8.006, df=2085,
p<.01

t=8.309, df=2078,
p<.01

t=7.801,
df=2010.645, p<.01

t=7.258,
df=1973,204, p<.01

t=4.509,
df=1996.739, p<.01

IW

H

1079

3.37

1.23

1077

3.44

1.25

1075

3.68

1.22

1075

3.88

1.11

1064

3.87

.91

_L___

1008

3.10

1.29

1003

3.21

1.32

1000

3.47

1.32

1004

3.69

1.22

1001

3.81

.89

t=4.839, df=2085,
p<.01

t=4.120, df=2078,
p<.01__

t=3.064,
df=2024.848,
p<.01

t=3.735,
df=2023.912, p<.01

t=1.690, df=2063,
p>.05__________________

IH

ɪɪ

1079

3.06

1.30

1077

3.38

1.29

1075

3.67

1.25

1075

4.13

1.06

1065

3.29

1.05

_L___

1008

2.86

1.33

1004

3.11

1.41

999

3.32

1.40

1003 ,

3.92,

1.22

1000

2.90

1.11

t=3.575, df=2085,
p<.01

t=4.625,
df=2026.152tp<.01

t=5.930,
df=2005.781, p<.01

t=4.116,
df=1983.966, p<.01

t=8.147, df=2063, p<.01

WD

H

1079

2.63

1.21

1077

2.61

1.17

1074

2.53

1.14

1075

2.63

1.12

1066

1.99

.96

_L__

1008

2.45

1.22

1004

2.32

1.18

1000

2.28

1.12

1004

2.40

1,18

994

1.73

.90

t=3.447, df=2085,
p<.01

t=5.447, df=2079,
p<.01

t=5.154, df=2072,
p<.01

t=4.419,
df=2045.688, p<.01

lt=6.455, df=2058,
p<.01__________________

GD

H

1079

2.81

1.30

1076

2.82

1.27

1072

2.70

1.21

1074

2.74

1.16

1065

1.62

.82

_L__

1008

2.65

1.31

1004

2.54

1.27

1000

2.44

1.18

1004

2,49

1.21

992

1.44

.72

t=2.718, df=2085, p<.01

t=5.020, df=2078,
p<.01__________________

t=4.920, df=2070,
p<.01__________________

t=4.770,
df=2051.647, p<.01

t=5.269,
df=2048,138, p<,01



More intriguing information

1. Do the Largest Firms Grow the Fastest? The Case of U.S. Dairies
2. The name is absent
3. EU enlargement and environmental policy
4. The name is absent
5. Growth and Technological Leadership in US Industries: A Spatial Econometric Analysis at the State Level, 1963-1997
6. The name is absent
7. Delivering job search services in rural labour markets: the role of ICT
8. Economic Evaluation of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), CHERE Working Paper 2007/6
9. Innovation and business performance - a provisional multi-regional analysis
10. Telecommuting and environmental policy - lessons from the Ecommute program