5th and 8th grade pupils’ and teachers’ perceptions of the relationships between teaching methods, classroom ethos, and positive affective attitudes towards learning mathematics in Japan



Table 7.3.8: Mean of frequency of deployment of teaching methods and affective attitude
promoted by teaching methods between pupils with higher and lower levels of friction at 8th
grade______

Enjoyment____________

Motivation_______________

Sense of security

Sense of progress

Deployment

N____

M___

SD

N____

M___

SD

N____

M___

SD

N____

M___

SD

N____

M___

SD

PW

H

625

2.74

1.39

624

2.65

1.32

623

2.52

1.22

622

2.77

1.31

620

1.42

.60

J____

1360

2,87

1.35

1355

2,68

1.27

1352

2.55

1.19

1352

2.74

1.22

1353

1.42

.61

t=-1.869, df=1983,
p>.05__________________

t=-.532,df=1977,
p>.05           _____

t=-.539,df=1973,
p>.05

t=.507,df=1133.069,
p>.05

t= .199, df=1971,
p>.05

UC

H

625

3.01

1.53

624

2.94

1.38

623

2.63

1.29

620

2.65

1.27

622

1.31

.64

J___

1359

3.10

1.50

1353

2.90

1.40

1349

2.61

1.27

1350

2.56

1.20

1352

1.38

.70

t=-1.236, df=1982, p>.0!

t= .592, df=1975,
p>.05         _______

t= .446, df=1970,
p>.05

t= 1.451, df=1968,
p>.05

t= - 2.283,
df=1304.205, p<.05

RT

H

624

2.52

1.21

623

2.36

1.23

623

2.72

1.28

622

3.13

1.28

622

2.97

1.14

J-__

1360

2.66

1.18

1349

2.50

1.15

1352

2.83

1.22

1350

3.17

1.24

1345

3.07

1.16

t=-2.299, df=1982,
p<.05__________________

t=-2.360,
df=1144.724, p<.05

t=-1.719,
df=1157.412, p>.05

t=-.723, df=1970,
p>.05          ____

t=-1.687, df=1965,
p>.05

TE

H

625

3.32

1.30

624

3.11

1.29

623

3.39

1.27

622

3.75

1.20

617

3.86

1.09

J-__

1360

3.41

1.21

1354

3.24

1.19

1352

3.47

1.20

1351

3.88

1.04

1349

4.10

.95

t=-1.407,
df=1136.819, p>.05

t=-2.051,
df=1126.089, p<.05

t=-1.385, df=1973,
p>.05__

t=-2.274,
Df=1063.877,
p<.05

t=-4.696,
df=1066.660, p<.01

IW

H

625

3.16

1.30

624

3.24

1.32

623

3.48

1.34

622

3.77

1.22

617

3.78

.98

J-__

1360

3.26

1.25

1354

3.39

1.26

1352

3.64

1.23

1352

3.82

1.13

1349

3.87

.85

t=-1.640, df=1983,
p>.05      ______

t=-2.351, df=1976, p<.0!

t=-2.522,
df=1117.788, p<.05

t= - .935,
df=1125.098, p>.05

t=-1.889,
df=1056.133, p>.05

IH

H

625

2.99

1.37

624

3.30

1.44

623

3.53

1.38

621

4.03

1.19

618

3.16

1.12

J-__

1360

2.98

1.29

1355

3.26

1.31

1351

3.52

1.30

1352

4.04

1.13

1348

3.10

1.08

t=.226, df=1143.969, p>.

t= .611, df=1117.035,
p>.05__________________

t= .131, df=1147.686, p>.

t=-.266, df=1971,
p>.05__________________

t= 1.159, df=1964,
p>.05__________________

WD

H

625

2.48

1.25

624

2.44

1.22

623

2.38

1.18

622

2.50

1.20

615

1.90

.98

J-___

1360

2.58

1.19

1355

2.49

1.17

1351

2.44

1.12

1352

2.53

1.13

1345

1.86

.93

t= -1.640,
df=1157.819, p>.05

t=-.834,df=1977,
p>.05 _____ ______

t=-1.007, df=1972,
p>.05    ______

t=-.556, df=1138.228, p:

t= 1.018, df=1958,
p>.05___

GD

H

625

2.64

1.34

624

2.65

1.32

622

2.55

1.25

621

2.61

1.23

610

1.57

.77

J-___

1360

2.80

1.28

1354

2.71

1.25

1350

2.60

1.18

1352

2.63

1.16

1345

1.52

.78

t= - 2.464,
df=1160.797, p<.05

t= - .994,
df=1152.504, p>,05

t= - .922,
df=1145.864, p>.05

t= - .459,
df=1139.793, p>.05

t= 1.296, df=1953,
p>.05__________________



More intriguing information

1. Electricity output in Spain: Economic analysis of the activity after liberalization
2. TECHNOLOGY AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT: THE CASE OF PATENTS AND FIRM LOCATION IN THE SPANISH MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS INDUSTRY.
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. Determinants of U.S. Textile and Apparel Import Trade
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. The Complexity Era in Economics
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent