5th and 8th grade pupils’ and teachers’ perceptions of the relationships between teaching methods, classroom ethos, and positive affective attitudes towards learning mathematics in Japan



Table 7.4.7: Mean of frequency of deployment of teaching methods and affective attitude
promoted by teaching methods between pupils perceiving their teachers praising them because
of increased effort with lower frequency and higher frequency at 5th grade_______________

Enjoyment________

Motivation         ____

Sense of security

Sense of progress

Deployment

N____

M___

SD

N____

M___

SD

N____

M__

SD

N____

M___

SD

N____

M___

SD

PW

H

906

3.45

1.26

906

3.44

1.26

901

3.35

1.23

902

3.55

1.23

905

2.51

.93

Jr__

561

3,04

1.41

561

2.99

1.41

560

2.94

1.37

560

3.13

1.39

560

2.25

.87

T=5.896, df=1465,
P<J1___

t=6.173,
df=1089.48U)<.01

t=5.689,
df=1088.614, p<.01

t=5.966,
df=1079.715, p<.01

t=5.356,
df=1248.959, p<.01

UC

H

904

3.26

1.54

904

3.29

1.48

901

3.05

1.41

899

3.12

1.33

903

1.60

.83

JL__

560

3.39

1.61

560

3.41

1.51

559

3.14

1.53

558

3.09

1.43

559

1.43

.75

t=-1.542,
df=1143.708, p>.05

t=-1.585, df=1462,
p>.05__________________

t=1.174,
df=1114.617, p>.05

t=.489,
df=1117.347, p>.05

t=3.935,
df=1273.982, p<.01

RT

H

904

2.99

1.16

903

2.93

1.28

900

3.11

1.31

901

3.56

1.28

903

3.46

.93

L___

559

2.59

1.17

561

2.52

1.23

559

2.71

1.30

560

3.21

1.41

559

3.34

1.02

t=6.323,
df=1169.543, p<.01

t=6.161, df=1462,

p<.01__________________

t=5.633, df=1457,
p<.01__________________

t=4.866,
df=1094.716, p<,01

t=2.220,
df=1101.888, p<.05

TE

H

905

3.60

1.15

906

3.53

1.19

901

3.53

1,22

904l

4.00∏

1.09

899

3.65

1.02

L___

561

3.16

1.29

561

2.94

1.31

560

3.09

1.31

560

3.53

1.32

557

3.55

1.10

t=6.634,
df=1084.194, p<.01

t=8.746, df=1465, p<.01

t=6.534, df=1459, p<.01

t=7.129,
df=1019.516, p<.01

t=1.688,
df=1110.972, p>.05

IW

H

906

2.97

1.29

906

3.14

1.39

902

3.23

1.35

904

3.53

1.28

897

3.53

.97

L___

561

2.83

1.36

561

2.86

1.40

560

3.09

1.45

560

3.33

1.43

559

3.42

1.04

t=1.982,
df=1139.847, p<.05

t=3.643, df=1465,
p<.01

t=1.866,
df=1120.330, p>.05

t=2.747,
df=1084.551, p<.01___

t=2.124,
df=1118.009, p<.05_____

IH

H

899

2.54

1.23

904

2.76

1.33

901

2.90

1.34

903

3.29

1.35

902

3.02

.98

L___

561

2.28

1.23

561

2.37

1.33

560

2.53

1.39

560

3.07

1.45

559

2.55

1.05

t=3.892, df=1458,
p<.01

t=5.370, df=1463,
p<.01 ______ ______

t=5.025,
df=1152,668, p<.01

t=2.976, df=1461, p<.01

t=8.536,
df=1127.447, p<.01

WD

H

906

3.34

1.15

906

3.33

1.18

902

3.29

1.19

904

3.49

1.22

894

3.37

1.07

J.__

561

2.88

1.23

561

2.83

1.28

560

2.84

1.31

560

3.08

1.34

555

3.07

1.12

t=7.264, df=1465, p<.01

t=7.621, df=1465,
p<.01__

t=6.553,
df=1096,099, p<.01

t=6.066, df=1462, p<.01

t=5.159, df=1447,
p<.01__________________

GD

H

906

3.27

1.20

906

3.30

1.18

902

3.28

1.15

902

3.38

1.19

897

2.50

.91

L

561

2.90

1.23

561

2.82

1.27

560

2.86

1.30

560

3.00

1.25

555

2.28

,93

t=5.781, df=1465,
p<.01__________________

t=7.353, df=1465,
p<.01__________________

t=6.354,
df=1078.917, p<.01

t=5.802, df=1460, p<.01

t=4.460, df=1450,
p<.01__________________



More intriguing information

1. Testing Panel Data Regression Models with Spatial Error Correlation
2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. Regional specialisation in a transition country - Hungary
6. Impact of Ethanol Production on U.S. and Regional Gasoline Prices and On the Profitability of U.S. Oil Refinery Industry
7. The name is absent
8. WP 92 - An overview of women's work and employment in Azerbaijan
9. Weak and strong sustainability indicators, and regional environmental resources
10. Langfristige Wachstumsaussichten der ukrainischen Wirtschaft : Potenziale und Barrieren