5th and 8th grade pupils’ and teachers’ perceptions of the relationships between teaching methods, classroom ethos, and positive affective attitudes towards learning mathematics in Japan



Table 7.4.8: Mean of frequency of deployment of teaching methods and affective attitude
promoted by teaching methods between pupils perceiving their teachers praising them because
of increased effort with lower frequency and higher frequency at 8th grade_______________

Enjoyment____________

Motivation______________

Sense of security

Sense of progress

Deployment__ ___

N___

M___

SD

N

M

SD

N

IVI_________

SD

N____

M___

SD

N____

M__

SD

PW

H

1225

2.87

1.34

1223

2.77

1.25

1222

2.62

1.16

1222

2.83

1.20

1215

1.50

.64

_L__

868

2.74

1.40

864

2.50

1.32

859

2.39

1.24

863

2.63

1.32

865

1.29

.53

t=2.043,
df=1816.698, p<.05

t=4.701,
df=1798.335,
p<,01

t=4.228,
df=1772.861, p<.01

t=3.584,
df=1745.784, p<.01

t=8.189,
df=2033.468, p<.01____

UC

~H~^

1224

3.11

1.51

1221

2.99

1.36

1219

2.68

1.25

1221

2.63

1.19

1217

1.39

.70

_L__

868

2.96

1.53

864

2.77

1.44

859

2.50

1.31

859

2.48

1.25

865

1.28

.63

t=2.287, df=2090,
p<.05___

t=3.448,
df=1787.128, p<.01

t=3.024,

df=1797,521, p<.01

t=2.723,
df=1794.730, p<.01

t=3.878,
df=1968.891, p<.01

RT

H

1224

2.67

1.16

1219

2.57

1.14

1222

2.88

1.19

1220

3.25

1.21

1210

3.04

1.11

L

867

2.52

1.22

861

2.27

1.19

859

2.67

1.30

863 j

3.01 і

1.31

862

3.03

1,21

t=2.852,
df=1809.854, p<.01

t=5.787, df=2087,
p<.01

t=3.751,
df=1738.390,
p<.01

t=4.374, df=2081,
p<.01___

t=.119,
df=1759.975, p>.05

TE

H

1225

3.54

1.16

1223

3.40

1.14

1222

3.63

1.15

1221

3.99

.99

1210

4.06

.96

_L__

868

3.11

1.31

863

2.89

1.27

859

3.16

1.28

863

3.58

1.20

862

3.91

1.08

t=7.759,
df=1721.129, p<.01

t=9.429,
df=1731.843, p<.01

t=8.510,
df=1720.501, p<.01

t=8.303,
df=1618.795, p<.01

t=3.365,
df=1714.599, p<.01

IW

H

1225

3.32

1.23

1223

3.43

1.24

1222

3.63

1.24

1222

3.88

1.10

1211

3.84

.89

L___

868

3.12

1.31

863

3.18

1.34

859

3.51

1.31

863

3.67

1.23

860

3.84

.91

t=3.399,
df=1789.029, p<.01

t=4.276,
df=1760.508, p<.01

t=2.116,
df=1784.776, p<.05

t=4.018,
df=1726.000, p<.01

t=.118, df=2069,
p>.05__________________

IH

H

1225

3.06

1.28

1223

3.40

1.28

1222

3.64

1.26

1222

4.14

1.05

1208

3.30

1.05

L

868

2.82

1.37

864 j

3.04

1.42

858

3.31

1.42

862

3.87

1.25

863

2.82

1.09

t=4.152,
df=1782.397, p<.01

t=5.899,
df=1738.344, p<.01

t=5.549,
df=1699.555,
p<.01

t=5.072,
df=1639.254, p<.01

t=9.942, df=2069,
p<.01__________________

WD

~H

1225

2.66

1.19

1223

2.61

1.16

1221

2.54

1.13

1222

2.63

1.11

1210

2.00

.95

__L____

868

2.38

1.23

864

2.27

1.19

859

2.22

1.13

863

2.36

1.20

856

1.66

.88

t=5.336, df=2091,
p<.01

t=6.414, df=2085,
p<.01

t=6.445, df=2078,
p<.01

t=5.340,
df=1770.648, p<.01

t=8.443, df=2064,
p<.01__________________

GD

H

1225

2.83

1.30

1222

2.80

1.26

1219

2.70

1.20

1221

2.75

1.17

1208

1.62

.81

_L__

868

2.60

1.31

864

2.52

1.27

859

2.40

1,18

863

2.44

1.20

855

1.40

.70

t=4.054, df=2091,
p<.01__________________

t=4.938, df=2084,
p<.01__________________

t=5.687, df=2076,
p<.01__________________

t=5.953,
df=1823.779, p<.01

t=6.689,
df=1981.350, p<.01



More intriguing information

1. Industrial Employment Growth in Spanish Regions - the Role Played by Size, Innovation, and Spatial Aspects
2. The name is absent
3. 101 Proposals to reform the Stability and Growth Pact. Why so many? A Survey
4. Prizes and Patents: Using Market Signals to Provide Incentives for Innovations
5. Inflation and Inflation Uncertainty in the Euro Area
6. Conflict and Uncertainty: A Dynamic Approach
7. Wirtschaftslage und Reformprozesse in Estland, Lettland, und Litauen: Bericht 2001
8. Climate Policy under Sustainable Discounted Utilitarianism
9. Public-Private Partnerships in Urban Development in the United States
10. DIVERSITY OF RURAL PLACES - TEXAS