5th and 8th grade pupils’ and teachers’ perceptions of the relationships between teaching methods, classroom ethos, and positive affective attitudes towards learning mathematics in Japan



Table 7.4.8: Mean of frequency of deployment of teaching methods and affective attitude
promoted by teaching methods between pupils perceiving their teachers praising them because
of increased effort with lower frequency and higher frequency at 8th grade_______________

Enjoyment____________

Motivation______________

Sense of security

Sense of progress

Deployment__ ___

N___

M___

SD

N

M

SD

N

IVI_________

SD

N____

M___

SD

N____

M__

SD

PW

H

1225

2.87

1.34

1223

2.77

1.25

1222

2.62

1.16

1222

2.83

1.20

1215

1.50

.64

_L__

868

2.74

1.40

864

2.50

1.32

859

2.39

1.24

863

2.63

1.32

865

1.29

.53

t=2.043,
df=1816.698, p<.05

t=4.701,
df=1798.335,
p<,01

t=4.228,
df=1772.861, p<.01

t=3.584,
df=1745.784, p<.01

t=8.189,
df=2033.468, p<.01____

UC

~H~^

1224

3.11

1.51

1221

2.99

1.36

1219

2.68

1.25

1221

2.63

1.19

1217

1.39

.70

_L__

868

2.96

1.53

864

2.77

1.44

859

2.50

1.31

859

2.48

1.25

865

1.28

.63

t=2.287, df=2090,
p<.05___

t=3.448,
df=1787.128, p<.01

t=3.024,

df=1797,521, p<.01

t=2.723,
df=1794.730, p<.01

t=3.878,
df=1968.891, p<.01

RT

H

1224

2.67

1.16

1219

2.57

1.14

1222

2.88

1.19

1220

3.25

1.21

1210

3.04

1.11

L

867

2.52

1.22

861

2.27

1.19

859

2.67

1.30

863 j

3.01 і

1.31

862

3.03

1,21

t=2.852,
df=1809.854, p<.01

t=5.787, df=2087,
p<.01

t=3.751,
df=1738.390,
p<.01

t=4.374, df=2081,
p<.01___

t=.119,
df=1759.975, p>.05

TE

H

1225

3.54

1.16

1223

3.40

1.14

1222

3.63

1.15

1221

3.99

.99

1210

4.06

.96

_L__

868

3.11

1.31

863

2.89

1.27

859

3.16

1.28

863

3.58

1.20

862

3.91

1.08

t=7.759,
df=1721.129, p<.01

t=9.429,
df=1731.843, p<.01

t=8.510,
df=1720.501, p<.01

t=8.303,
df=1618.795, p<.01

t=3.365,
df=1714.599, p<.01

IW

H

1225

3.32

1.23

1223

3.43

1.24

1222

3.63

1.24

1222

3.88

1.10

1211

3.84

.89

L___

868

3.12

1.31

863

3.18

1.34

859

3.51

1.31

863

3.67

1.23

860

3.84

.91

t=3.399,
df=1789.029, p<.01

t=4.276,
df=1760.508, p<.01

t=2.116,
df=1784.776, p<.05

t=4.018,
df=1726.000, p<.01

t=.118, df=2069,
p>.05__________________

IH

H

1225

3.06

1.28

1223

3.40

1.28

1222

3.64

1.26

1222

4.14

1.05

1208

3.30

1.05

L

868

2.82

1.37

864 j

3.04

1.42

858

3.31

1.42

862

3.87

1.25

863

2.82

1.09

t=4.152,
df=1782.397, p<.01

t=5.899,
df=1738.344, p<.01

t=5.549,
df=1699.555,
p<.01

t=5.072,
df=1639.254, p<.01

t=9.942, df=2069,
p<.01__________________

WD

~H

1225

2.66

1.19

1223

2.61

1.16

1221

2.54

1.13

1222

2.63

1.11

1210

2.00

.95

__L____

868

2.38

1.23

864

2.27

1.19

859

2.22

1.13

863

2.36

1.20

856

1.66

.88

t=5.336, df=2091,
p<.01

t=6.414, df=2085,
p<.01

t=6.445, df=2078,
p<.01

t=5.340,
df=1770.648, p<.01

t=8.443, df=2064,
p<.01__________________

GD

H

1225

2.83

1.30

1222

2.80

1.26

1219

2.70

1.20

1221

2.75

1.17

1208

1.62

.81

_L__

868

2.60

1.31

864

2.52

1.27

859

2.40

1,18

863

2.44

1.20

855

1.40

.70

t=4.054, df=2091,
p<.01__________________

t=4.938, df=2084,
p<.01__________________

t=5.687, df=2076,
p<.01__________________

t=5.953,
df=1823.779, p<.01

t=6.689,
df=1981.350, p<.01



More intriguing information

1. A Theoretical Growth Model for Ireland
2. AGRICULTURAL TRADE LIBERALIZATION UNDER NAFTA: REPORTING ON THE REPORT CARD
3. The name is absent
4. Julkinen T&K-rahoitus ja sen vaikutus yrityksiin - Analyysi metalli- ja elektroniikkateollisuudesta
5. The name is absent
6. Public infrastructure capital, scale economies and returns to variety
7. The Cost of Food Safety Technologies in the Meat and Poultry Industries.
8. A Duality Approach to Testing the Economic Behaviour of Dairy-Marketing Co-operatives: The Case of Ireland
9. WP 92 - An overview of women's work and employment in Azerbaijan
10. An Estimated DSGE Model of the Indian Economy.