5th and 8th grade pupils’ and teachers’ perceptions of the relationships between teaching methods, classroom ethos, and positive affective attitudes towards learning mathematics in Japan



Table 7.4.8: Mean of frequency of deployment of teaching methods and affective attitude
promoted by teaching methods between pupils perceiving their teachers praising them because
of increased effort with lower frequency and higher frequency at 8th grade_______________

Enjoyment____________

Motivation______________

Sense of security

Sense of progress

Deployment__ ___

N___

M___

SD

N

M

SD

N

IVI_________

SD

N____

M___

SD

N____

M__

SD

PW

H

1225

2.87

1.34

1223

2.77

1.25

1222

2.62

1.16

1222

2.83

1.20

1215

1.50

.64

_L__

868

2.74

1.40

864

2.50

1.32

859

2.39

1.24

863

2.63

1.32

865

1.29

.53

t=2.043,
df=1816.698, p<.05

t=4.701,
df=1798.335,
p<,01

t=4.228,
df=1772.861, p<.01

t=3.584,
df=1745.784, p<.01

t=8.189,
df=2033.468, p<.01____

UC

~H~^

1224

3.11

1.51

1221

2.99

1.36

1219

2.68

1.25

1221

2.63

1.19

1217

1.39

.70

_L__

868

2.96

1.53

864

2.77

1.44

859

2.50

1.31

859

2.48

1.25

865

1.28

.63

t=2.287, df=2090,
p<.05___

t=3.448,
df=1787.128, p<.01

t=3.024,

df=1797,521, p<.01

t=2.723,
df=1794.730, p<.01

t=3.878,
df=1968.891, p<.01

RT

H

1224

2.67

1.16

1219

2.57

1.14

1222

2.88

1.19

1220

3.25

1.21

1210

3.04

1.11

L

867

2.52

1.22

861

2.27

1.19

859

2.67

1.30

863 j

3.01 і

1.31

862

3.03

1,21

t=2.852,
df=1809.854, p<.01

t=5.787, df=2087,
p<.01

t=3.751,
df=1738.390,
p<.01

t=4.374, df=2081,
p<.01___

t=.119,
df=1759.975, p>.05

TE

H

1225

3.54

1.16

1223

3.40

1.14

1222

3.63

1.15

1221

3.99

.99

1210

4.06

.96

_L__

868

3.11

1.31

863

2.89

1.27

859

3.16

1.28

863

3.58

1.20

862

3.91

1.08

t=7.759,
df=1721.129, p<.01

t=9.429,
df=1731.843, p<.01

t=8.510,
df=1720.501, p<.01

t=8.303,
df=1618.795, p<.01

t=3.365,
df=1714.599, p<.01

IW

H

1225

3.32

1.23

1223

3.43

1.24

1222

3.63

1.24

1222

3.88

1.10

1211

3.84

.89

L___

868

3.12

1.31

863

3.18

1.34

859

3.51

1.31

863

3.67

1.23

860

3.84

.91

t=3.399,
df=1789.029, p<.01

t=4.276,
df=1760.508, p<.01

t=2.116,
df=1784.776, p<.05

t=4.018,
df=1726.000, p<.01

t=.118, df=2069,
p>.05__________________

IH

H

1225

3.06

1.28

1223

3.40

1.28

1222

3.64

1.26

1222

4.14

1.05

1208

3.30

1.05

L

868

2.82

1.37

864 j

3.04

1.42

858

3.31

1.42

862

3.87

1.25

863

2.82

1.09

t=4.152,
df=1782.397, p<.01

t=5.899,
df=1738.344, p<.01

t=5.549,
df=1699.555,
p<.01

t=5.072,
df=1639.254, p<.01

t=9.942, df=2069,
p<.01__________________

WD

~H

1225

2.66

1.19

1223

2.61

1.16

1221

2.54

1.13

1222

2.63

1.11

1210

2.00

.95

__L____

868

2.38

1.23

864

2.27

1.19

859

2.22

1.13

863

2.36

1.20

856

1.66

.88

t=5.336, df=2091,
p<.01

t=6.414, df=2085,
p<.01

t=6.445, df=2078,
p<.01

t=5.340,
df=1770.648, p<.01

t=8.443, df=2064,
p<.01__________________

GD

H

1225

2.83

1.30

1222

2.80

1.26

1219

2.70

1.20

1221

2.75

1.17

1208

1.62

.81

_L__

868

2.60

1.31

864

2.52

1.27

859

2.40

1,18

863

2.44

1.20

855

1.40

.70

t=4.054, df=2091,
p<.01__________________

t=4.938, df=2084,
p<.01__________________

t=5.687, df=2076,
p<.01__________________

t=5.953,
df=1823.779, p<.01

t=6.689,
df=1981.350, p<.01



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Ruptures in the probability scale. Calculation of ruptures’ values
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. Migration and Technological Change in Rural Households: Complements or Substitutes?
6. The name is absent
7. FOREIGN AGRICULTURAL SERVICE PROGRAMS AND FOREIGN RELATIONS
8. The Economics of Uncovered Interest Parity Condition for Emerging Markets: A Survey
9. TOWARD CULTURAL ONCOLOGY: THE EVOLUTIONARY INFORMATION DYNAMICS OF CANCER
10. The magnitude and Cyclical Behavior of Financial Market Frictions