Regionale Wachstumseffekte der GRW-Förderung? Eine räumlich-ökonometrische Analyse auf Basis deutscher Arbeitsmarktregionen



30


Modellerweiterung zur Analyse râumlicher Effekte

Tabelle 3:

Modellerweiterungen zur Messung von raumlichen Spillover-Effekten
und râumlicher Autokorrelation

Modell

V /
ML-SAR

VI /
ML-SEM

VII /
ML-SDM

VIII /
ML-SDEM

Arbeitsproduktivitat in 1994
(Ln (BIP(1994)∕EWT(1994)))

-0.024***
(0.006)

-0.024***
(0.006)

-0.028***
(0.006)

-0.029***
(0.006)

Beschaftigungswachstum (plus Abschrei-
bung u techn. Fortschritt

(Ln EWT)

-0.006***
(0.002)

-0.006***
(0.002)

-0.007***
(0.002)

-0.007***
(0.002)

Investitionsintensitat

(Ln S)____________________________________

0.006***
(0.001)

0.005***
(0.001)

0.005***
(0.001)

0.005***
(0.001)

% Anteil Verarbeitendes Gewerbe
(Ln IND)

0.004***
(0.001)

0.005***
(0.001)

0.007***
(0.001)

0.007***
(0.001)

Humankapital
(Ln HK)

0.012
(0.010)

0.015
(0.010)

0.029***
(0.011)

0.030***
(0.010)

FuE-Industrien
(Ln Tech)

0.004**
(0.001)

0.004***
(0.001)

0.002*
(0.001)

0.002*
(0.001)

Marktpotenzial
(Ln MPOT)

0.002*
(0.001)

0.002*
(0.001)

0.003***
(0.001)

0.003***
(0.001)

Bevolkerungsdichte
(Ln BVD)

-0.007

(0.005)

-0.006

(0.005)

-0.005

(0.005)

-0.005

(0.005)

Quadrierte Bevolkerungsdichte
(Ln BVD^2)

0.001
(0.001)

0.001
(0.001)

0.001
(0.001)

0.001
(0.001)

Forderdummy (D_GRW)

0.071***
(0.028)

0.081***
(0.028)

0.085***
(0.028)

0.081***
(0.028)

Ln Y(1994) x D_GRW

-0.019***
(0.0074)

-0.021***
(0.007)

-0.022***
(0.007)

-0.021***
(0.007)

W * D_GRW

-0.323**
(0.005)

-0.276***
(0.103)

W * (Ln Y(1994) x D_GRW)

0.085**
(0.040)

0.072**
(0.028)

W * Ln BVD

-0.020***
(0.005)

-0.022***
(0.004)

P

0.073
(0.098)

0.240

(0.461)

λ

0.561***
(0.164)

-0.634

(0.862)

Log Likelihood

863.55

866.32

873.88

874.06

Wald Test of ρ /λ = 0

χ2(i)=o.56
(0.45)

χ2(1)=11.69***
(0.00)

χ2(1)=0.27
(0.60)

χ2(1)=0.54
(0.46)

Moran’s I
(P-Value)

2.490***
(0.00)

6.452***
(0.00)

0.706
(0.24)

-0.147
(0.44)

Anmerkungen: *, **, *** = signifikant auf dem 10%, 5% und 1% Niveau.
Standardfehler in Klammern.



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. SAEA EDITOR'S REPORT, FEBRUARY 1988
5. Models of Cognition: Neurological possibility does not indicate neurological plausibility.
6. Ruptures in the probability scale. Calculation of ruptures’ values
7. The name is absent
8. Naïve Bayes vs. Decision Trees vs. Neural Networks in the Classification of Training Web Pages
9. Centre for Longitudinal Studies
10. Automatic Dream Sentiment Analysis