Table 7.1.1: Mean of frequency of deployment of teaching methods and affective attitude
promoted by teaching methods between pupils with higher and lower levels of general self-
Concept at 5th grade ____________________________________________________________
Enjoyment____________ |
Motivation_______________ |
Sense Ofsecurity_______ |
Senseofprogress |
Deployment | ||||||||||||
N____ |
M___ |
SD |
N____ |
M |
SD |
N___ |
M___ |
SD |
N____ |
M___ |
SD |
N____ |
M___ |
SD | ||
PW |
H |
648 |
3.53 |
1.32 |
648 |
3.57 |
1.30 |
647 |
3.53 |
1.27 |
646 |
3.63 |
1.27 |
646 |
2.56 |
.94 |
_L__ |
802 |
3.10 |
1.31 |
802 |
3.01 |
1.32 |
797 |
2.90 |
1.26 |
799 |
3.19 |
1.31 |
801 |
2.27 |
.87 | |
t=6.124, df=1448, p<.01 |
t=8.063, df=1448, p<.01 |
t=9.459, df=1378.659, |
t=6.409, df=1443, |
t=6.027, df=1334.307, | ||||||||||||
UC |
H |
648 |
3.40 |
1.55 |
647 |
3.42 |
1.43 |
647 |
3.19 |
1.42 |
645 |
3.18 |
1.33 |
644 |
1.53 |
.78 |
_L__ |
799 |
3.25 |
1.57 |
800 |
3.27 |
1,54 |
796 |
3.02 |
1,48 |
796 |
3.07 |
1.40 |
800 |
1.53 |
.82 | |
t=1.889, df=1445, p>.05__________________ |
t=2.004, df=1417.417, |
t=2.166, df=1441, |
t=1.630, df=1439, |
t=.064, df=1442, | ||||||||||||
RT |
H |
647 |
2.99 |
1.20 |
646 |
2.90 |
1.28 |
646 |
3.16 |
1.31 |
646 |
3.61 |
1.30 |
644 |
3.54 |
.99 |
_L___ |
799 |
2.71 |
1.14 |
801 |
2.67 |
1.25 |
796 |
2.79 |
1.30 |
799 |
3.28 |
1.35 |
801 |
3.31 |
.94 | |
t=4.568, df=1444, |
t=3.455, df=1445, |
t=5.353, df=1440, |
t=4.688, df=1443, |
t=4.389, df=1341.675, p<.01__________________ | ||||||||||||
ɪ |
H |
648 |
3.58 |
1.17 |
648 |
3.47 |
1.20 |
647 |
3.57 |
1.21 |
647 |
4.02 |
1.07 |
640 |
3.77 |
1.00 |
_L___ |
801 |
3.29 |
1.26 |
802 |
3.15 |
1.30 |
797 |
3.18 |
1.29 |
800 |
3.64 |
1.27 |
798 |
3.48 |
1.07 | |
t=4.573, df=1447, p<.01________ _______ |
t=4.807, df=1448, |
t=5.783, df=1442, |
t=6.125, df=1442.559, p<.01__________________ |
t=5.207, df=1402.392, p<.01__________________ | ||||||||||||
IW |
H |
648 |
3.17 |
1.33 |
648 |
3.26 |
1.38 |
647 |
3.45 |
1.32 |
647 |
3.73 |
1.22 |
639 |
3.64 |
.95 |
L |
802 |
2.71 |
1.28 |
802 |
2.85 |
1.38 |
798 |
2.95 |
1.39 |
800 |
3.24 |
1.38 |
799 |
3.37 |
1.01 | |
t=6.588, df=1448, |
t=5.686, df=1448, |
t=6.917, df=1443, |
t=7.047, df=1434.339, p<.01__ |
t=5.270, df=1399.526, p<.01__________________ | ||||||||||||
IH |
H |
647 |
2.54 |
1.25 |
647 |
2.77 |
1.33 |
646 |
2.97 |
1.35 |
647 |
3.44 |
1.32 |
645 |
2.95 |
1.05 |
L___ |
796 |
2.37 |
1.21 |
801 |
2.48 |
1.33 |
798 |
2.58 |
1.35 |
799 |
3.01 |
1.42 |
799 |
2.73 |
1.01 | |
t=2.530, df=1441, |
t=4.041, df=1446, |
t=5.475, df=1442, |
t=5.873, df=1444, |
t=3.985, df=1442, p<.01 | ||||||||||||
WD |
H |
648 |
3.40 |
1.20 |
648 |
3.37 |
1.19 |
647 |
3.38 |
1.21 |
647 |
3.60 |
1.21 |
640 |
3.46 |
1.07 |
L___ |
802 |
2.96 |
1.16 |
802 |
2.93 |
1.24 |
798 |
2.89 |
1.24 |
800 |
3.11 |
1.29 |
790 |
3.09 |
1.09 | |
t=7.071, df=1366.122, |
t=6.775, df=1448, p<.01 |
t=7.607, df=1443, |
t=7.424, df=1445, |
t=6.423, df=1428, p<.01 | ||||||||||||
GD |
H |
648 |
3.36 |
1.19 |
648 |
3.40 |
1.17 |
647 |
3.38 |
1.17 |
646 |
3.43 |
1.18 |
639 |
2.55 |
.89 |
L___ |
802 |
2.94 |
1.23 |
802 |
2.90 |
1.23 |
798 |
2.90 |
1.22 |
799 |
3.07 |
1.25 |
796 |
2.28 |
.92 | |
t=6.596, df=1448, |
t=7.844, df=1448, p<.01 |
t=7.463, df=1443, |
t=5.569, df=1443, |
t=5.712, df=1433, |
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 11
3. The value-added of primary schools: what is it really measuring?
4. The name is absent
5. AN ANALYTICAL METHOD TO CALCULATE THE ERGODIC AND DIFFERENCE MATRICES OF THE DISCOUNTED MARKOV DECISION PROCESSES
6. Proceedings from the ECFIN Workshop "The budgetary implications of structural reforms" - Brussels, 2 December 2005
7. Exchange Rate Uncertainty and Trade Growth - A Comparison of Linear and Nonlinear (Forecasting) Models
8. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ALTERNATIVE ECONOMETRIC PACKAGES: AN APPLICATION TO ITALIAN DEPOSIT INTEREST RATES
9. Can we design a market for competitive health insurance? CHERE Discussion Paper No 53
10. Population ageing, taxation, pensions and health costs, CHERE Working Paper 2007/10